Self v. Executive Committee of Georgia Baptist Convention of Georgia, Inc.

Decision Date08 April 1980
Docket NumberNo. 35632,35632
Citation245 Ga. 548,266 S.E.2d 168
PartiesSELF v. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF the GEORGIA BAPTIST CONVENTION OF GEORGIA, INC.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Roy E. Barnes, Gregory C. Chastain, Marietta, for appellant.

Daryll Love, Anthony L. Cochran, Atlanta, for appellee.

BOWLES, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Self v. Executive Committee of the Ga. Baptist Convention of Ga., Inc., 151 Ga.App. 298, 259 S.E.2d 695 (1979). After careful consideration, we find that the rule set forth in Howard v. Walker, 242 Ga. 406, 249 S.E.2d 45 (1978), was incorrectly applied to the facts in this case. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals, and hold that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendant.

To briefly review the facts, plaintiff's husband was a patient at the defendant Georgia Baptist Hospital. Mr. Self was admitted suffering from acute leukemia. On the day of his death Mr. Self went to the bathroom where he allegedly slipped and fell. Plaintiff sued the hospital alleging that the fall was the result of the hospital's negligence in failing to properly repair a leaking bathroom fixture of which the hospital had notice. The fall was alleged to have contributed to the patient's death.

The hospital filed a motion for summary judgment supported by a deposition of the physician who performed an autopsy on the deceased. The deposition stated that there was no causal connection between Mr. Self's fall and his death, and that the fall could not have accelerated his death. The death certificate prepared by another physician attributed Mr. Self's death to internal cerebral hemorrhage due to acute leukemia.

The trial court granted summary judgment based upon Howard v. Walker, supra, which held, "in those cases where the plaintiff must produce an expert's opinion in order to prevail at trial, when the defendant produces an expert's opinion in his favor on motion for summary judgment and the plaintiff fails to produce a contrary expert opinion in opposition to that motion, then there is no genuine issue to be tried by the jury and it is not error to grant summary judgment to the defendant." The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Howard v. Walker, supra, was a legal malpractice case in which summary judgment was granted against the plaintiff for his failure to rebut expert legal testimony submitted by the defendant. In malpractice actions against professionals, it is essential to the plaintiff's cause of action that competent evidence be presented as to the reasonableness...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • Lutz v. Foran
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 8, 1993
    ...a plaintiff must present expert testimony "to establish the parameters of acceptable professional conduct." Self v. Executive Comm., 245 Ga. 548, 549, 266 S.E.2d 168 (1980). Not every act that a professional performs, however, is a professional act that requires expert testimony. Kneip v. S......
  • Cowart v. Widener
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • July 12, 2010
    ...evidence typically is not required to prove causation in a simple negligence case. See, e.g., Self v. Exec. Comm. of the Ga. Baptist Convention of Ga., 245 Ga. 548, 549, 266 S.E.2d 168 (1980). However, expert evidence is required where a “medical question” involving truly specialized medica......
  • Smith v. U.S., Civ.A. 9:97-3592-8.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • June 5, 2000
    ...720, 722 (1992); McGraw v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 200 W.Va. 114, 488 S.E.2d 389, 396 (1997); and Self v. Executive Comm., of Georgia Baptist Convention, 245 Ga. 548, 266 S.E.2d 168, 169 (1980). 6. In a medical malpractice action in South Carolina, sometimes expert testimony is not required if ......
  • Cherokee County Hosp. Authority v. Beaver
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 23, 1986
    ...Knight, supra (medical evidence of trauma attributable to injury rather than disease). Compare also Self v. Executive Committee of Ga. Baptist Convention, 245 Ga. 548, 266 S.E.2d 168 (1980) (a simple negligence case, wherein proof that an injury is the proximate result of medical malpractic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Litigating Nursing Home Cases in Georgia
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 8-2, October 2002
    • Invalid date
    ...Inc. v. McNorrill, 182 Ga.App. 107, 109-110, 354 S.E.2d 872, 875-76 (1987). 49. See Self v. Exec. Comm. of Ga. Baptist Convention, Inc., 245 Ga. 548, 549, 266 S.E.2d 168, (1980). 50. See Moore, 216 Ga. App. at 300, 454 S.E.2d at 191-92 (citing Candler Gen'l Hosp., 182 Ga.App. at 110, 354 S.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT