Selig v. Trost
| Decision Date | 14 February 1916 |
| Citation | Selig v. Trost, 110 Miss. 584, 70 So. 699 (Miss. 1916) |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | SELIG v. TROST ET AL |
October 1915
APPEAL from the chancery court of Londes county. HON. J. F. MCCOOL Chancellor.
Suit between William Trost and others, executors, and Mrs. Hanna L. Selig for construction of the will of Samuel Selig deceased. From a decree for complainant, defendant appealed.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Decree reversed and cause remanded.
W. H Kier, for appellant.
Owen & Garnett, for appellee.
The will of Samuel Selig, deceased, submitted to us by this record for construction, contains the following item:
Mrs. Selig, also now deceased, survived her husband, and by will devised the property received from him; her power so to do being the sole question for decision presented to us by this record.
Taking the will by its four corners and construing it as a whole, it is clear that the testator did not mean to vest his wife with power to dispose of the property by will but that what he did mean is simply...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Dealy v. Keatts
...et al. v. Lightcap et al., 76 So. 489, 115 Miss. 417; Harvey et al. v. Johnson et al., 71 So. 824, 111 Miss. 566; Selig v. Trost et al., 70 So. 669, 110 Miss. 584; Chrisman v. Bryant et al., 66 So. 779, 108 311; Henry et al. v. Henderson et al., 60 So. 33, 103 Miss. 48; Henry et al. v. Hend......
-
Scott v. Turner
... ... Ball v. Phelan, supra; ... In re Blake, supra; Underhill on Wills, sec. 468 ... 5. A ... will must be construed as a whole. Selig v. Trost, ... (Miss.) 70 So. 699; Hale v. Neilson, 112 Miss. 291 ... 6 ... Where denial of a gift by implication will bring about an ... ...
-
Dealy v. Keatts, 28494
...et al. v. Lightcap et al., 76 So. 489, 115 Miss. 417; Harvey et al. v. Johnson et al., 71 So. 824, 111 Miss. 566; Selig v. Trost et al., 70 So. 669, 110 Miss. 584; Chrisman v. Bryant et al., 66 So. 779, 108 311; Henry et al. v. Henderson et al., 60 So. 33, 103 Miss. 48; Henry et al. v. Hend......
-
First Nat. Bank of Guthrie v. State (In re Inheritance Tax On Dale's Estate)
...247 S.W. 1006; Chesnut v. Chestnut, 300 Pa. 146, 151 A. 339, 75 A. L. R. 66; Smith v. Field, 98 N.J. Eq. 532, 131 A. 521; Selig v. Trost, 110 Miss. 584, 70 So. 699; Smith v. Walker, 118 Me. 473, 109 A. 10; Newlin v. Phillips (Del.) 38 Del. Ch. 36, 60 A. 1068; Priewe v. Priewe, 43 N.D. 509, ......