Sellers v. White
| Decision Date | 22 June 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 38930,38930,2 |
| Parties | Eunice K. SELLERS v. Luther WHITE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Hallie Bell, Macon, for plaintiff in error.
Jones, Sparks, Benton & Cork, Frank C. Jones, Edward L. Benton, Macon, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
1. This is an action for damages by a guest passenger in an automobile against the driver of another vehicle which allegedly collided with the one in which she was riding. The evidence of the plaintiff and her husband is to the effect that she was riding in the right front seat traveling along a dual-lane paved highway at a speed not exceeding 30 to 45 miles an hour, that her husband was driving in a proper manner; that the defendant's car pulled suddenly into the highway without stopping at the stop sign at the intersection of a secondary road with the highway; that she and her husband first saw it entering the road when only 15 or 20 feet away, and that there was no way of avoiding the collision. The evidence of the defendant was to the effect that it was not his automobile which collided with that driven by the plaintiff's husband. Under no theory of the pleadings or evidence was an issue raised as to whether the plaintiff, by the exercise of any diligence on her part, could have avoided her injuries. It was accordingly error to condition the plaintiff's right to recover upon proof that she 'by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence could not have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence after it became apparent, or should have become apparent to her.' Kuttner v. Swanson, 59 Ga.App. 818(3), 2 S.E.2d 230, 233; Cooper v. Georgia Power Co., 44 Ga.App. 581, 162 S.E. 302; Mishoe v. Davis, 64 Ga.App. 700(21), 14 S.E.2d 187; Johnson v. Pittard, 62 Ga.App. 550(1), 8 S.E.2d 717; Bellamy v. Georgia Power Co., 67 Ga.App. 569(1), 21 S.E.2d 294; Wade v. Drinkard, 76 Ga.App. 159, 166(7), 45 S.E.2d 231; Toles v. Hair, 83 Ga.App. 144(1), 63 S.E.2d 3; Healan v. Powell, 91 Ga.App. 787, 788(3a), 87 S.E.2d 332; Smith v. Harrison, 92 Ga.App. 576(4, 5), 89 S.E.2d 273. Special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for new trial show reversible error.
2. It was not error for any reason assigned to charge that sympathy for the plaintiff should play no part in the deliberations of the jury, and that the plaintiff would be entitled to recover only if it was shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was negligent in one or more of the particulars alleged in the petition and that such negligence was a contributing proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
3. The defendant tendered two accusations charging him with the offenses of drunk driving and leaving the scene of the accident together with a record showing both charges and been not prossed. Upon objection by plaintiff's counsel the court stated he was allowing them for the limited purpose of rebutting other testimony to the effect that the defendant had been arrested on the night in question. Defendant's counsel then formally offered the documents in evidence and the court said to counsel for the plaintiff, 'Any objections, Mr. Bell?' to which counsel replied, 'I think not, Your Honor.' 'Where evidence is objected to and the court, in response to the objection, states that he does not admit it generally, but admits it for a special purpose, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bailey v. Todd, 47209
...S.E. 105; Green v. Hines, 25 Ga.App. 202, 102 S.E. 899; Jackson v. Seaboard Air-Line R., 140 Ga. 277(3), 78 S.E. 1059; Sellers v. White, 104 Ga.App. 148, 121 S.E.2d 385; and Elam v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 115 Ga.App. 656, 155 S.E.2d 644. Of course, where there is nothing in the record ......
-
Beadles v. Bowen, 39473
...Parks v. Fuller, 100 Ga.App. 463, 467(2), 111 S.E.2d 755; Bentley v. Buice, 102 Ga.App. 101, 105(2), 115 S.E.2d 706; Sellers v. White, 104 Ga.App. 148(1), 121 S.E.2d 385 and citations. Furthermore, when the defendants pled contributory negligence as an affirmative defense in the case sub ju......
-
A Child's World, Inc. v. Lane
...Edwards himself had then relayed the existence of his conversation with the employee to appellee's father. See Sellers v. White, 104 Ga.App. 148, 149(5), 121 S.E.2d 385 (1961). "As a fundamental rule, the definition of hearsay does not include out-of-court statements which are not offered a......
-
Browning v. Kahle, 39401
...706, supra; Smith v. Harrison, 92 Ga.App. 576(4), 89 S.E.2d 273; Lawrence v. Hayes, 92 Ga.App. 778, 90 S.E.2d 102; Sellers v. White, 104 Ga.App. 148(2), 121 S.E.2d 385. Motion ...