Selph v. State, 53375
Decision Date | 18 April 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 53375,53375,1 |
Citation | 234 S.E.2d 831,142 Ga.App. 26 |
Parties | B. L. SELPH v. The STATE |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
J. Robert Daniel, Macon, for appellant.
Walker P. Johnson, Jr., Dist. Atty., W. Donald Thompson, Thomas H. Hinson, Asst. Dist. Attys., Macon, for appellee.
Bobby Lee Selph appeals his conviction by jury in the trial court for burglary and sentence of 12 years, the last 4 on probation. His grounds are as follows: (1) the verdict was unauthorized; (2) the court failed to direct a verdict in his favor; and (3) the court's charge on flight. We affirm.
Two police officers in Macon, Georgia noticed Selph with a motorcycle and blue helmet. It was approximately 1:55 a. m. and he was parked on the sidewalk. An investigation showed the motor was cold. Selph displayed his driver's license, gave his address and explained he was out of gas and his brother-in-law had gone to a Fina station to get some. Later the officers reported this motorcycle and were informed it belonged to another party, not Selph. After leaving Selph, the officers passed a Fina station about 2 blocks from where they had talked to Selph and noticed a broken pane of glass in a bay door. Upon opening the door, motorcycle tracks were discovered on the floor where it had passed through a puddle of water. The operator testified that he locked up at 6:00 p. m. and the motorcycle and helmet described by the officers were locked inside. He also stated that Selph had operated the station in the past, had been around the station several times that day and was given a ride home that night by the operator after closing. Upon learning these things, officers went back to the place where they first saw Selph and the motorcycle. Selph was gone, the blue helmet was found on a vacant lot about 20 feet away and the motorcycle was about 100 yards from where Selph and the officers first met. Upon investigation, it was found that the address given by Selph was false; however, he was arrested later at the place where he and his wife lived. The owner of the motorcycle identified it and the helmet, stated that the key was in the switch and it was hard to crank. There was evidence the vehicle had been pushed some distance. Selph offered no explanation for the possession of the motorcycle and helmet. He claimed misidentification and alibi. However, his evidence of alibi did not exclude his presence at the scene of the crime or the spot where the officers saw him with the motorcycle.
1. Appellant contends there was no evidence showing an unauthorized entry by him of the burglarized service station, and in the absence of such proof the evidence was insufficient to convict him of burglary, relying on Bennett v. State, 136 Ga.App. 806, 222 S.E.2d 207. We quote the facts and the ruling in that case, emphasizing the language relied upon by the appellant. "Jimmy Clayton Bennett was indicted and tried for burglary of a 38-caliber revolver from a motor vehicle. This is an appeal from his conviction for said offense. Held :
On reflection, we conclude that the reasoning in that case was erroneous. The record in that case shows an unauthorized entry into the truck by a person unknown, entry being obtained into the locked truck by prying open a vent window in the door. The rule has been long established in this State that where a theft, whether by simple larceny, burglary, or robbery, is proven, that recent unexplained possession of the stolen goods by the defendant creates...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williamson v. State
...of these facts beyond a reasonable doubt creates a presumption or permissible inference of defendant's guilt." Selph v. State, 142 Ga.App. 26, 29, 234 S.E.2d 831 (1977). (b) In Jackson v. Virginia, supra, the United States Supreme Court examined the constitutional underpinnings of Thompson ......
-
Jones v. Kemp
...See Williamson v. State, 248 Ga. 47, 281 S.E.2d 512 (1981); Brown v. State, 157 Ga.App. 473, 278 S.E.2d 31 (1981); Selph v. State, 142 Ga.App. 26, 234 S.E.2d 831 (1977). See also Cosby v. Jones, 682 F.2d 1373 (11th Jones next complains of three jury instructions given in the charge by the s......
-
Howard v. State, 56538
...there was no testimony offered to rebut direct testimony of, and the corresponding presumption arising from (see, e. g., Selph v. State, 142 Ga.App. 26, 234 S.E.2d 831), the accused's recent possession of stolen property. We know of no presumption of homicide applicable to the instant case ......
-
Saine v. State
...sufficient to convict." Nash v. State, 166 Ga.App. 533, 535, 304 S.E.2d 727 (1983); McGee v. State, supra. See also Selph v. State, 142 Ga.App. 26, 234 S.E.2d 831 (1977); Lee v. State, 126 Ga.App. 38, 189 S.E.2d 872 Moreover, the transcript discloses that appellant made no objection to the ......