Sentry Ins. A Mut. Co. v. Czinner, 84-2478
| Decision Date | 18 February 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-2478,84-2478 |
| Citation | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467,483 So.2d 500 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 467 SENTRY INSURANCE A MUTUAL COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Thomas CZINNER and Nancy Czinner, his wife, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
An Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Dade County; Rhea Pincus Grossman and Gerald T. Wetherington, Judges.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary Wilder, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross appellee.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Brumer, Cohen, Logan & Kandell, Miami, for appellees/cross-appellants.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Upon consideration of the appeal and cross-appeal, we affirm the Final Judgment and post-trial orders. Appellant failed to demonstrate the existence of evident partiality on the part of the neutral arbitrator. § 682.13, Fla.Stat. (1983). Under these circumstances, we decline to apply Gaines Construction Co. v. Carol City Utilities, Inc., 164 So.2d 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), aff'd, 180 So.2d 213 (Fla.1965).
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lozano v. Maryland Cas. Co., s. 87-5037
...of that action. At least one Florida court has rejected the same argument made to it. See Brief for Appellant at 9-18, Sentry Ins. A Mut. Co. v. Czinner, 483 So.2d 500 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986). Here, there is no evidence that Kubicki was even aware that these cases existed or that the two cas......
- State v. Ogburn, 85-805