Servamerica, Inc. v. Rolfe, X--52

Citation318 So.2d 178
Decision Date13 August 1975
Docket NumberNo. X--52,X--52
Parties115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4508 SERVAMERICA, INC., and Stand 'N Snack of America, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Michael B. ROLFE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

William L. Durden, and Timothy A. Burleigh, of Kent, Sears, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Lawrence C. Rolfe, of Gelman & Rolfe, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

BOYER, Chief Judge.

Appellants, defendants in the trial court, appeal from a final judgment rendered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of the appellee, plaintiff in the trial court, for compensatory damages in the sum of $3,000.

While working as an assistant manager at a Winn-Dixie Store, appellee was induced to abandon that position in order to go to work for appellant with the promise that he would ultimately be placed in a supervisory position. Appellee gave up his job with Winn-Dixie and became employed by appellant, but was never promoted to a supervisory position. The lagging economy of the country necessitated institution by appellant of an austerity program whereupon appellee was discharged. He filed suit alleging breach of an oral contract of employment.

Appellant urges that under Florida law an action may not be maintained for termination of a contract of employment without some agreement as to the length of time that the employment is to continue, citing Wynne v. Ludman Corporation, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1955, 79 So.2d 690, and that a contract for employment for an indefinite period of time is terminable at the will of either party, citing Knudsen v. Green, Sup.Ct.Fla. 1934, 156 So. 240. It further urges that inasmuch as there is nothing in the record of this cause to prove that the employment of appellee by appellant was other than for an indefinite period, terminable at the will of either party, the alleged cause of action for wrongful termination of the oral employment contract cannot be sustained.

Appellee concedes the correctness of the principles of law urged by appellant but contends that his action is not for the breach of an oral contract of employment for an indefinite period of time (which he concedes is terminable at will) but he urges instead that the gravamen of his complaint is that appellant contracted to employ him (appellee) in a supervisory capacity, to wit: in a specific position, which was never done.

The facts of this case are remarkably simliar to those in Knudsen v. Green, supra. There the plaintiff, while an employee of Standard Oil Company entitled to various fringe benefits was induced by the defendant to give up that position in reliance upon the defendant's oral agreement to hire the plaintiff as the master of the defendant's houseboat (a specific position). The plaintiff gave up his position with Standard Oil and at the direction of the defendant traveled to Maimi where he remained subject to the defendant's orders for several months when he was ultimately discharged by the defendant without ever becoming employed as master of defendant's boat, the position for which he was hired. Under those facts the Supreme Court of Florida held:

'Our conclusion is that under the contract as pleaded the defendant Green did not bind himself to employ the plaintiff, nor did the plaintiff obligate himself to remain in defendant's service for any definite period of time beyond the first month of hiring, and that the hiring, after the expiration of the first month, being indefinite as to its duration, could be lawfully terminated at the will of either party upon the giving of notice of dismissal. See Odom v. Bush, 125 Ga. 184, 53 S.E. 1013; Derry v. Board of Education of City of East Saginaw, 102 Mich. 631, 61 N.W. 61. An agreement to serve and be served at so much per month, with no stipulation as to the term of the services, is determinable at the end of any month at the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Crawford v. David Shapiro & Co., P.A.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 1986
    ...denied, 367 So.2d 1123 (Fla.1979)); Hartley v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc., 476 So.2d 1327, 1328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Servamerica, Inc. v. Rolfe, 318 So.2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). In this case, no duration of employment was specified in either the original or the subsequent offer of employment. T......
  • Sanders v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1986
    ...sharing agreement." Harrison, 342 F.Supp. at 350. Finally, the case we find to be most directly on point is Servamerica, Inc. v. Rolfe, 318 So.2d 178 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975). There, the plaintiff claimed that, while working as an assistant manager at a grocery store, he was induced to leave ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT