Service Facilities Corp. v. Lanier, 78-999
| Decision Date | 13 June 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 78-999,78-999 |
| Citation | 371 So.2d 1083 |
| Parties | SERVICE FACILITIES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Wade H. LANIER, Jr., Property Appraiser, Osceola County, Florida, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bruce E. Chapin, Orlando, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph C. Mellichamp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, R. Stephen Miles, Jr., of Miles & Cumbie, and Murray W. Overstreet, Jr., of Overstreet & Ritch, Kissimmee, for appellees.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff taxpayer from a final judgment. Appellant was the plaintiff below and is a water and sewer corporation. Plaintiff sued the County Property Appraiser challenging the assessments for the years 1974, 1975, and 1976, on its tangible personal property. The complaint alleged that the property appraiser had not considered the factors contained in Section 193.011 Florida Statutes (1971) or followed the dictates of the Florida Administrative Code, Rule 12B-1.103(2)(E). The case was tried before the court without a jury and at the close of the plaintiff's case, a judgment was entered for defendant. We reverse.
Assuming presentation of a prima facie case, the trial judge in a non-jury matter may not weigh and judge the credibility of the evidence when ruling upon a defendant's motion pursuant to Rule 1.420(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972). Such a motion for involuntary dismissal following the presentation of the plaintiff's prima facie case is in the nature of a ruling on a motion for directed verdict in a jury trial. We conclude that a prima facie case was presented and that the trial court could not have granted the motion without weighing the probative effect of at least some of the evidence. We, therefore, conclude that the trial court erroneously entered judgment for defendant and the final judgment, including the taxation of costs and interest, is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services on Behalf of Williams v. Thibodeaux, 88-03202
...Tillman; Murphy. See also Sea Tower Apartments, Inc. v. Century Nat'l Bank, 406 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Service Facilities Corp. v. Lanier, 371 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Buchanan Constr., Inc. v. City of Tallahassee, 308 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We also must reject any con......
-
Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County v. Cibula, 91-0921
...(Fla.1972); Wimbledon Townhouse Condominium I Ass'n., Inc. v. Wolfson, 510 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Service Facilities Corp. v. Lanier, 371 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Alpha Elec. Supply, Inc. v. Jewel Builders, Inc., 349 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA The cause is remanded for a new tr......
-
Murphy v. Community Centers Corp., UU-171
...or final judgment made at the close of the plaintiffs' case. Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972); Service Facilities Corporation v. Lanier, 371 So.2d 1083 (Fla.App.1979). Concluding, as we do, that a prima facie case of breach of contract was made by the plaintiffs, the trial court ......
-
Christie v. General Elec. Credit Corp., 83-1338
...of the evidence when ruling upon a motion pursuant to Rule 1.420(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Service Facilities Corp. v. Lanier, 371 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 Thus, the court was premature in granting appellee's motion. Accordingly, we ......