Sessions v. State
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Hurt |
| Citation | Sessions v. State, 38 S.W. 623 (Tex. Crim. App. 1897) |
| Decision Date | 21 January 1897 |
| Parties | SESSIONS v. STATE. |
Appeal from Falls district court; S. R. Scott, Judge.
Hill Sessions appeals from a conviction. Reversed.
Rice & Bartlett, J. Gameson, and T. H. Clampett, for appellant. Mann Trice, for the State.
The indictment charged that appellant, Virgil Adkins, Maud Adkins, and Oscar Smith, on the 15th day of April, 1896, in Falls county, did enter into a positive agreement with each other to commit the offense of theft of horses. The second count charged such an agreement to commit the theft of the horse of E. C. Noble. This last count was abandoned, and appellant convicted on the first count, his punishment being fixed at two years' confinement in the penitentiary.
We pretermit any expression of opinion as to whether the first count is sufficient; in other words, whether the offense of conspiracy, as defined in article 953, Pen. Code 1895, is committed by parties entering into a positive agreement to commit theft generally. This conviction was obtained upon the testimony of Lewis Fergurson, who was an accomplice,— a party to the agreement. This fact was recognized by the trial judge, who charged the jury that Fergurson was an accomplice. We have searched this record closely, but fail to find any testimony from any source corroborating the accomplice. When this positive agreement was made, the offense of conspiracy was complete. The state, over the objections of the appellant, introduced in evidence the acts and declarations of a co-conspirator, proving by Fergurson and others that Adkins was found in the possession of a stolen horse, —in fact, had stolen the horse of one Gray,— and other acts and declarations of a co-conspirator after the completion of the offense. Such evidence is not admissible in this character of case. A conspiracy...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wilkerson v. State
...the jury that, if they believed these facts (naming them), Waites, in law, would be an accomplice." And again, in Sessions v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 58, 38 S. W. 605, the same judge, in delivering the opinion of the court, holds that, where it is apparent that a witness testifying in a case ......
-
Ex parte Lyman
...Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 25 L.Ed. 717; Ash v. State, 81 Ala. 76, 1 So. 558; Wharton, Criminal Law, Sec. 1339; Sessions v. State, 37 Tex.Cr.R. 62, 38 S.W. 623; Conant v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 610, 103 S.W. Respondent relies upon the following authorities: In re Eckart, 166 U.S. 481, 17 ......
-
Boone v. State
...or abandoned, is not admissible against his codefendant. Wright v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 627, 40 S. W. 491; Sessions v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 66, 38 S. W. 623; Vernon's Tex. Crim. Stat. vol. 2, p. 757, note 13; Choice v. State, 52 Tex. Cr. R. 287, 106 S. W. 387; Bouldin v. State, 87 Tex. Cr......
- Wood v. State