Sewall v. Roberts
Decision Date | 20 June 1874 |
Citation | 115 Mass. 262 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Parties | Charles C. Sewall, executor, v. Helen M. Roberts & others |
[Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]
Suffolk. Bill in equity by the executor of the will of Robert Roberts, to obtain the instructions of the court as to the disposal of the trust fund hereinafter mentioned. The case was reserved by Ames, J., on the bill, answers and report; and thereby appeared to be as follows:
On June 2, 1825, Nathaniel Curtis and Isaac Clapp, the administrators of Robert Roberts, Senior, calling themselves trustees of Robert Roberts of Boston, the testator, deposited with the Massachusetts Hospital Life Insurance Company the sum of one hundred thousand dollars, and received from the company the following instrument in writing signed by its officers:
"And the said company, for the consideration aforesaid, further promise and agree to and with the said N. Curtis and I. Clapp, trustees, their executors and administrators, that in sixty days after proof of the decease of the said Robert, they will assign, transfer and pay the amount of the aforesaid principal sum, (or such part thereof as shall not have been lost by bad debts or otherwise, without the actual fault of said company or their servants,) and all interest then due thereon at the time of his death, in real estate, stocks, notes, bonds and mortgages belonging to said company, all, any or either of them, at the pleasure and discretion of the directors, at the prices at which the same respectively shall stand charged in the books of the company at the decease of said Robert, in the way and manner provided in said extract from said article, to his executor or executors, administrator or administrators, in trust for the special use and benefit of any child or children of said Robert Roberts; if one only, in trust for his or her use and benefit; if more than one, for their use and benefit equally, the legal representatives to take their parent's share; and in case the said Robert Roberts shall die without leaving any issue, then at his decease to pay said principal sum to his mother, Eliza Roberts, for her own use; but in case the said Robert Roberts shall die without leaving any lawful issue, and his said mother shall die before him, then at his decease to pay said principal sum to his executor or executors, administrator or administrators, in trust for the use of his heirs at law and the heirs at law of his said mother, equally to be divided between them." Evidence was introduced upon the question whether the money deposited in trust was derived by the testator by inheritance from his father, a statement of which is unnecessary for the understanding of the questions of law decided.
On July 17, 1855, an indenture was executed under their hands and seals, between the testator and his mother, Eliza Roberts, of the first part, Nathaniel Curtis, Junior, of the second part, and Helen M. Roberts, wife of the testator, of the third part, which, after reciting the terms of the annuity in trust before mentioned, proceeded as follows: "Now this indenture witnesseth, that the said Robert and Eliza Roberts, the parties of the first part, in consideration of one dollar to them severally paid by the said Nath'l Curtis, Junior, party of the second part, and for other good and valuable considerations them thereto moving, in the event of the said Robert Roberts dying leaving his said wife surviving, but without leaving any issue, do hereby severally give, grant, sell, assign and transfer to the said Curtis, his executor or executors, administrator or administrators, all their respective rights, titles and interests in and to said principal sum of one hundred thousand dollars, to hold upon the following trusts; to wit, during the life of the said Helen M. Roberts, party of the third part, to reinvest the same with the Massachusetts Hospital Life Insurance Company, and to collect the incomes or profits arising therefrom, and after paying and deducting a reasonable compensation for his services, to pay over the residue of the income to the said Helen M. Roberts, the party of the third part, during her life, to her sole and separate use, independently of any husband; and upon her decease to convey, pay over and transfer the principal sum to such person or persons as would have been entitled to the same if the said Robert Roberts had deceased at that time, and these presents had not been executed."
Eliza Roberts died in the latter part of 1855, and the testator on March 27, 1865, executed an instrument under his hand and seal, as follows:
On May 7, 1864, the testator presented a petition to the Probate Court for Norfolk County, for his appointment as guardian of Ada Parker, and said court on the same day, her parents being both dead, but her grandparents all living and assenting thereto, but without the appointment of any guardian ad litem, or the assent of any one acting as next friend, appointed the testator as guardian, as prayed for. A bond was given, but no inventory was ever returned.
On April 1, 1865, the testator and his wife presented a petition signed by them to said Probate Court, for the adoption of said Ada Parker, she being then under the age of fourteen years, and for the change of her name. This was assented to by the testator as guardian. All the said grandparents who signed their assent to his appointment as guardian were living at the time of the presenting the petition for adoption, and the decree thereon; but nothing appears on the records or files of said court tending to show that said grandparents, or either of them, had any notice or knowledge of such petition or proceedings; no notice or order of notice was issued on such petition for adoption, no guardian ad litem was appointed, and, so far as the records show, no one acted or assented as the next friend of said Ada Parker; and on the same day said court decreed that "from this day said child shall, to all legal intents...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graves v. Graves
...128 N.J. Eq. 140, 15 Atl. (2d) 340; In re Holden's Tr., 207 Minn. 211, 291 N.W. 104; Leeper v. Leeper, 147 S.W. (2d) 660; Sewall v. Roberts, 115 Mass. 262; Hartwell v. Tefft, 19 R.I. 644, 35 Atl. 882; In re Olney, 27 R.I. 495, 63 Atl. 956; Laws 1917, pp. 193-194; Secs. 9613, 9614, R.S. 1939......
-
Thompson, In re
...long before 1935 when the will here involved was drawn, that 'issue' included an adopted child. It was so held in Sewall v. Roberts, 115 Mass. 262 (Sup.Jud.Ct.1874). That case involved an irrevocable Inter vivos trust created in 1825. The funds were deemed to be those of Robert Roberts, the......
-
Graves v. Graves
... ... Estate, 128 N.J.Eq. 140, 15 A.2d 340; In re ... Holden's Tr., 207 Minn. 211, 291 N.W. 104; ... Leeper v. Leeper, 147 S.W.2d 660; Sewall v ... Roberts, 115 Mass. 262; Hartwell v. Tefft, 19 ... R. I. 644, 35 A. 882; In re Olney, 27 R. I. 495, 63 ... A. 956; Laws 1917, pp. 193-194; ... ...
-
Leeper v. Leeper
...was executed and after the death of grantor. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Hill, 76 S.W.2d 687; Brock v. Dorman, 98 S.W.2d 673; Sewall v. Roberts, 115 Mass. 262; In Olney, 27 R. I. 495, 63 A. 956; Hartwell v. Tefft, 19 R. I. 644, 35 A. 882, 34 L. R. A. 500; Vergin v. Marwick, 97 Me. 578, 55 ......