Sexton v. State, 1D04-2457.
| Decision Date | 07 April 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D04-2457.,1D04-2457. |
| Parties | Kent SEXTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Sherri T. Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Kent Sexton appeals an order of the lower court denying his motion to dismiss a charge of manslaughter, contending that the evidence relating to his motor-vehicle accident was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of culpable negligence. We agree and reverse.
In reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to dismiss an information, we are required to resolve all inferences from the facts in the light most favorable to the state. Whether the trial court ruled correctly is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 744 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
; Bell v. State, 835 So.2d 392 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
The undisputed facts are that Sexton, age 20, had been drinking the night before the accident and then had five hours of sleep. He left his home in Newberry, Florida, at 5:45 a.m., on February 26, 2001, on his way to work in St. Augustine. Because he was running late for work, he was driving seven to ten miles per hour (m.p.h.) over the posted speed limit of 55 m.p.h. At the time of the accident, it was still dark; the weather was clear; and the two-lane road was dry. At approximately 6:25 a.m., while Sexton was driving in an easterly direction on County Road 235 in Alachua County, his truck veered across the double-yellow line into the west-bound lane and continued for about 62 feet, which took less than a second, until it struck Edwards' truck, which was proceeding westerly. Edwards was killed instantly and Sexton suffered minor injuries. Following the accident, Sexton made inconsistent reports of what had occurred. He initially said he had fallen asleep at the wheel. Later, he informed investigators he was reaching for a cell phone just before the collision. An examination conducted nearly two hours later revealed a blood-alcohol level of .034. A half-empty bottle of whiskey was found in his truck.
Section 782.07(1), Florida Statutes (2001), proscribes the "killing of a human being by the act, procurement, or culpable negligence of another, without lawful justification." Culpable negligence "involves a state of mind so wanton or reckless that the behavior it produces may be regarded as intentional." Bowen v. State, 791 So.2d 44, 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). It requires a showing of "negligence of such a gross and flagrant character that it evinces a reckless disregard for human life." Id. at 61-62. Evidence of excessive speed coupled with intoxication is not sufficient to meet this standard, without more. See Filmon v. State, 336 So.2d 586 (Fla.1976)
;...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ibeagwa v. State, 1D12–2602.
...that the behavior it produces may be regarded as intentional.” Bowen v. State, 791 So.2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also Sexton v. State, 898 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). In fact, at oral argument for this case, the State advanced the strict liability standard to its logical conclusion. ......
-
State v. Gaulden
...A trial court's ruling on a motion to dismiss a criminal charge is a question of law, subject to de novo review. Sexton v. State, 898 So.2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The propriety of the trial court's ruling in this case turns on its interpretation of section 316.027(1)(b), which is a......
-
State v. Depriest
...both Depriest and the State to support their respective positions. See e.g. Miller v. State, 75 So.2d 312 (Fla.1954) ; Sexton v. State, 898 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). We find that the undisputed facts of this case are not like the cases cited by Depriest. Depriest was not briefly distr......
-
Clayton v. State, 1D15–3417.
...aren't settled. Indeed, the trial court was obliged to view the facts in a light most favorable to the State. See Sexton v. State, 898 So.2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). In this instance, it would have been premature to decide Mr. Clayton's objective entrapment defense on a motion to dis......
-
Crimes
...the center line causing a collision, does not show sufficient culpable negligence to sustain a manslaughter charge. Sexton v. State, 898 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) Third District Court of Appeal The court errs in granting a c(4) motion to dismiss in a vehicular homicide case based on t......