Seymour v. City of Tacoma
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | STILES, J. |
| Citation | Seymour v. City of Tacoma, 6 Wash. 138, 32 P. 1077 (Wash. 1893) |
| Decision Date | 24 March 1893 |
| Parties | SEYMOUR v. CITY OF TACOMA ET AL. |
Appeal from superior court, Pierce county; Emmett N. Parker, Judge.
Action by Edmund Seymour against the city of Tacoma and others to enjoin an election. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Alfred E. Buell, for appellant.
F. H Murray and Galusha Parsons, for respondents.
The appellant sought to enjoin the holding of an election in the city of Tacoma looking to carrying out the scheme which is set forth in the following ordinance:
The following are the points raised as objections to the validity of the ordinance as the basis for the popular vote on the proposition to be submitted: (1) The action sought to be taken by the city is under authority of, and in accordance with the provisions of, the act relating to internal improvements in cities and towns, approved March 26, 1890 (Laws Wash. 1889-90, p. 520,) as amended March 9, 1891, (Laws Wash. 1891, p. 326;) and it is contended that this act, in so far as it is a grant of power to "purchase," is void, for the reason that it is not mentioned in the title of the act, which relates merely to "construction." (2) The ordinance fails to specify the works and plant with sufficient detail to enable the taxpayers to determine, without going to other sources of information, the expediency of purchasing the property offered, and at the price named. (3) The act provides that the ratification of the system or plan proposed, and the assent to the incurring of indebtedness, shall be submitted to the voters as separate questions. (4) The ordinance provides, by its terms, that the proposition therein contained shall be submitted to the voters, while the act requires that the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Superior Court of King County
... ... commission to raise rates for telephone service in a city ... above the rates fixed by ordinance granting the franchise to ... operate a ... expense of private rights.' Tacoma v. Boutelle, ... 61 Wash. 434, 112 P. 661 ... The ... power to ... 1064; State ex rel. Seattle v. Carson, 6 ... Wash. 250, 33 P. 428; Seymour v. Tacoma, 6 Wash ... 138, 32 P. 1077; State ex rel. Fawcett v. Superior ... Court, ... ...
-
Katz v. Herrick
... ... v. Mayor, 114 Tenn. 213, 84 ... S.W. 810; Lumberman's Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kansas City ... etc. Ry. Co., 149 Mo. 165, 50 S.W. 281; Buffalo Zinc ... Co. v. Crump, 70 Ark. 525, 91 Am ... 299; Ex ... parte Liddell, 93 Cal. 633, 29 P. 251; People v ... Banks, 67 N.Y. 568; Seymour v. City of Tacoma, ... 6 Wash. 138, 32 P. 1077; Lancey v. King Co., 15 ... Wash. 9, 45 P. 645, ... ...
-
Kerlin v. City of Devils Lake
...v. Congregation, 81 Wis. 599, 51 N. W. 1007;Green Bay v. Brauns, 50 Wis. 204, 6 N. W. 503; and other cases. See, also, Seymour v. Tacoma, 6 Wash. 138, 32 Pac. 1077. As to the cases cited by appellant, we do not consider them in point. Both were construing section 2262 of the Revised Codes o......
-
Garfield Cnty. Transp. Auth. v. State
...be deceived as to what matters are being legislated upon.’ " WASAVP , 174 Wash.2d at 660, 278 P.3d 632 (quoting Seymour v. City of Tacoma , 6 Wash. 138, 149, 32 P. 1077 (1893) ). " ‘[A] title which is misleading and false is not constitutionally framed.’ " Id. at 661, 278 P.3d 632 (alterati......