SH v. Department of Children and Families, 5D00-1639.
| Decision Date | 06 October 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D00-1639.,5D00-1639. |
| Parties | S.H., as Parent of D.H. and J.H., Children, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Madonna H. Whittaker, Altamonte Springs, for Petitioner.
No Appearance for Respondent.
We deny the petition for certiorari on the merits. The petition fails to allege how the trial court's order of May 2, 2000 constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law causing irreparable harm. See Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987)
().
The petitioner seeks remedies from this court when adequate remedies are available in the lower court where pleadings can be dismissed or stricken after making findings of fact. Certiorari is not a writ of expediency and cannot be used to circumvent the interlocutory appeal rule. See Hawaiian Inn of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Snead Constr. Corp., 393 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
PETITION DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster
...v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1998); Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987); S.H. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 769 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)). Hence, this court has consistently held that certiorari is the appropriate vehicle to challenge non-final ord......
-
In the Interest of D.R.C. v. J.G., 2D10–4431.
...So.2d at 435; State, Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. L.G., 801 So.2d 1047, 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); S.H. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 769 So.2d 452, 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Under this standard, relief by means of certiorari is not available when there is no irreparable harm or wh......
-
Mariner Health Care v. Griffith
...See Champaign Nat. Bank & Trust v. SOS Industries, Inc., 847 So.2d 1164, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); S.H. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 769 So.2d 452, 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). To be entitled to certiorari review of a non-final order, a petitioner must demonstrate that the trial court's o......
-
Department of Children and Families v. LD
...Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1998); Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987); S.H. v. Department of Children & Families, 769 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). The Department argues there is no legal basis for the trial judge's refusal to rule on the termination petit......