Shaffer v. Ross

Decision Date31 July 1962
Docket NumberNo. 61-805,61-805
Citation143 So.2d 568
PartiesOren W. SHAFFER, Appellant, v. Frank ROSS, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert V. Shea and Curtis A. Myers, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Thomas J. Walsh, Homestead, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, as plaintiff, brought a complaint for dissolution of a claimed partnership with the defendant and for an accounting. The chancellor dismissed the suit at the close of the plaintiff's case. The question therefore is whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case of the existence of a partnership. Hill v. Beacham, 79 Fla. 430, 85 So. 147.

A review of the evidence submitted shows a failure to prove a mutuality of interest in the profits and losses; therefore the chancellor correctly concluded that a partnership was not proved. Stevens v. McKibbin, 68 F. 406, 411 (5th Cir.1895). See Cooper v. Fulton, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 616.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Dreyfuss v. Dreyfuss, 96-1381
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 Noviembre 1997
    ...Florida Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert denied, 327 So.2d 32 (Fla.1976); Shaffer v. Ross, 143 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). To establish a partnership, there must be a "community of interest in performance of a common purpose, joint control or right of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT