Shamblen v. Modern Woodmen of America
Decision Date | 28 February 1928 |
Docket Number | 6107. |
Citation | 142 S.E. 447,105 W.Va. 252 |
Parties | SHAMBLEN v. MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Submitted February 21, 1928.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 1928.
Syllabus by the Court.
An application for insurance states that, inasmuch as the "head officers" of the insurer act upon the written statements and answers in the application in determining whether a policy shall issue, no information had or given to any one other than its head officers shall be binding on it or in any way affect its rights. Held, the insurer is not estopped to contest the policy on the ground of misrepresentation in the application merely because a subordinate agent had knowledge of actual conditions.
Point 7 in the syllabus of Schwarzbach v. Protective Union, 25 W.Va. 623, 52 Am. Rep. 227, relative to the effect of false warranties in an application for insurance, applied.
Error to Circuit Court, Jackson County.
Action by Cloh Shamblen against the Modern Woodmen of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and remanded.
Geo. G Perrin, of Rock Island, Ill., and Price, Smith & Spilman and J. M. Woods, all of Charleston, for plaintiff in error.
Lewis H. Miller and Walter F. Boggess, both of Ripley, for defendant in error.
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover $3,000 as the beneficiary named in a benefit certificate issued by defendant to her husband, Roy Shamblen.
The defendant is a fraternal beneficiary society. The certificate in question is dated January 30, 1926, and was issued to Shamblen as a member of a local camp of defendant at Hurricane, W.Va. In answer to questions in the application upon which the certificate was issued, it is stated that both Shamblen and his wife resided in Hurricane; that his business was that of a traveling salesman, and that he performed no work or duties incident to any other occupation; that the application was for original membership; and that he had not within five years prior thereto been treated by a physician for influenza, or consulted with and been treated by a physician in regard to "personal ailments." Shamblen died May 7, 1926, from miliary tuberculosis.
The proof shows that both Shamblen and his wife resided at Ripley; that he was town sergeant of Ripley; that he had been a member of defendant's camp at Ripley from April, 1920 to November, 1924, when he was suspended for nonpayment of dues; and that within two years prior to the application in question he had suffered a severe attack of influenza, during which he had been treated by a physician.
The answers were written by Roy Hylbert after discussing them with Shamblen. Hylbert was a "deputy head consul" of the defendant, with authority to organize new camps in seven counties of this state, for which he received compensation. At the time the application was prepared Hylbert was attempting to organize a camp at Hurricane. He solicited Shamblen to become one of the charter members there in order to make up the necessary quota. He knew that some of the answers in the application were not true, and, in fact, suggested their falsity himself. He read the answers to Shamblen after they were written, however, and Shamblen "acquiesced in them." Hylbert attempted an explanation of each misleading statement, except the answer relative to influenza, to which he did not refer.
The application contains the following covenant:
The following conditions were made part of the benefit certificate:
One of the by-laws of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial