Shannon v. Shannon

Decision Date27 February 1958
Docket NumberNo. A-164,A-164
Citation101 So.2d 428
PartiesWinifred B. SHANNON, Appellant, v. Edward M. SHANNON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

John S. Duss, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert E. Hucker, Jacksonville, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree entered by the Circuit Court of Duval County, granting appellant's counterclaim for divorce. The principal error assigned is the Chancellor's failure to adjudicate that portion of the counterclaim wherein appellant specifically alleged a special equity in certain property accumulated by the parties during their marriage. Both the complaint filed by the husband, and the answer and counterclaim filed by the wife, prayed for divorce and for an equitable division of all real and personal property owned by the parties. In addition to other properties listed in her counterclaim, appellant specifically asserted an equitable interest in a used car sales and finance business purchased and operated by the parties as a partnership for a number of years prior to their separation. In his answer to the counterclaim the husband denied that his wife owned any interest in the partinership business and alleged that she had released and assigned her interests to him in accordance with an agreement reached by them prior to their separation.

At the trial of the cause the husband acknowledged that the foregoing release agreement was without consideration, and was made on his representation to the wife that she would continue to own one-half of 'everything' he had. The testimony of accountants who were called as witnesses indicate the value of the business assets to be approximately $75,000.

By the decree, the Chancellor granted a divorce to the wife, awarded her custody of and support for the minor children, and alimony. The decree also provided for an equitable division of certain properties, title to which was held by the entireties, but is entirely silent as to the wife's alleged interest in the used car sales and finance business. The Chancellor made no findings or adjudication as to whether the wife did or did not have any interest in this business, nor the extent of such interest, if, indeed, there was any.

It is the settled law of this jurisdiction that when a wife has made a material contribution to the husband's acquisition of property during coverture, she acquires a special equity in the property so accumulated, which equity entitles her, upon divorce, to an award in satisfaction thereof. 1 Further, there is a distinction between such a special equity and the wife's entitlement to alimony. 2 An award of alimony will not suffice as a substitute for a wife's special equity in her...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Spears v. Spears, D-363
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Enero 1963
    ...and upon divorce is entitled to an award in satisfaction thereof. Chaachou v. Chaachou (Fla.1961), 135 So.2d 206: Shannon v. Shannon (Fla.App.1958), 101 So.2d 428; Foreman v. Foreman (Fla.1949), 40 So.2d 560; Parsons v. Parsons, 154 Fla. 299, 17 So.2d 223; Engebretsen v. Engebretsen, 151 Fl......
  • Jennings v. Jennings, 76--151
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 Enero 1977
    ...property rights. Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 935, 37 So.2d 423 (1948); Dockery v. Dockery, 43 So.2d 460 (Fla.1949); Shannon v. Shannon, 101 So.2d 428 (Fla.1st DCA 1958). This principle has been tempered inrecent years by allowing a specific reservation of jurisdiction to later determine pr......
  • Henderson v. Henderson, 1615
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Septiembre 1969
    ...brought be either party to determine his or her respective property rights. Dockery v. Dockery, Fla.1949, 43 So.2d 460; Shannon v. Shannon, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 428. The final judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment in favor of the wife as to such special interests and equ......
  • Pitman v. Pitman, 75--1714
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 Octubre 1976
    ...brought by either party to determine his or her respective property rights. Dockery v. Dockery, Fla.1949, 43 So.2d 460; Shannon v. Shannon, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 428. 'The final judgment is reversed with directions to enter judgment in favor of the wife as to such special interests and eq......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT