Shaw v. Kellogg
| Decision Date | 02 May 1898 |
| Docket Number | No. 154,154 |
| Citation | 42 L.Ed. 1050,170 U.S. 312,18 S.Ct. 632 |
| Parties | SHAW v. KELLOGG |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
This was an action of ejectment brought in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Colorado on July 3, 1893, to recover possession of a certain tract in Saguache county, in the state of Colorado, described as follows:
'Section twenty-two (22), township one (1) north, one (1) east, according to the plat of said Baca Grant No. 4, as filed and recorded in the office of the county clerk and recorder of said Saguache county, and including in said section twenty-two, certain mineral-bearing property, designated by the defendant as the 'Eastern Star Mine,' with other mining lands adjacent thereto within said section twenty-two.'
After answer, a trial was had before a jury, which resulted in a verdict under instructions of the judge for defendant. Upon this verdict, judgment was entered, May 22, 1895. Thereupon the plaintiff sued out a writ of error from the circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit. On March 30, 1896, that court certified certain questions. Upon an examination of those questions, and after argument of counsel, this court, on December 22, 1897, ordered a certiorari to bring up the entire record, and upon such entire record the case was submitted for consideration.
The premises in question are within the limits of the so-called 'Baca Grant No. 4.' The plaintiff is the owner of that grant, and the question presented is as to the validity and extent of his title. Prior to the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo between Mexico and the United States, of date February 2, 1848, by which New Mexico and other territory in the southwest was ceded to this government, Mexico had made some quite extensive grants of tracts of land within the territory ceded. Since then congress has provided for the several portions of the ceded territory different modes of determining the validity and extent of those grants. By the act of July 22, 1854 (10 Stat. 308), the office of surveyor general for the territory of New Mexico was created; and, by section 8, it was made his duty to examine into all claims for lands within the limits of that territory, and to make full report thereof to congress. In pursuance of this authority, the surveyor general examined and reported upon various claims, and on June 21, 1860 (12 Stat. 71), congress passed an act confirming several of them. There were two opposing claimants for a large tract of land in the vicinity of the town of Las Vegas. In settling the dispute between them, congress enacted, in section 6:
On July 26, 1860, a letter of instructions was issued by the land department to the surveyor general of New Mexico in reference to these private land claims. In that letter, after directing a survey of the Las Vegas grant, and a determination of the area thereof, the instructions were as follows:
'The exact area of the Las Vegas town tract having been thus ascertained, the right will accrue to the Baca claimants to select a quantity equal to the area of the town tract elsewhere in New Mexico of vacant land, not mineral, in square bodies not exceeding five in number.
'In either case the final condition of the certificate to this office must be accompanied by a statement from yourself and register and receiver that the land is vacant, and not mineral.'
The survey made of the grant to the town of Las Vegas showed an acreage of 496,446.96 acres, a certificate of which fact was given to the heirs of said Baca.
On December 12, 1862, the following selection was filed with the surveyor general of New Mexico:
'Santa F e, New Mexico, Dec. 12, 1862.
'To Surveyor General John A. Clark, Surveyor General of New Mexico: I, John S. Watts, attorney of the heirs of Luis Maria Baca, have this day selected, as one of the five locations belonging to the said heirs under the sixth section of the act of congress approved June 21, 1860, a tract of land in the territory of New Mexico, described as follows:
'Beginning at a point on the eastern edge of the valley of San Luis, where the thirty-eighth parallel of north latitude crosses the base of the snowy range, dividing the waters of the rivers Arkansas and Del Norte; thence east, along said parallel, four and one-half miles; thence south, along a meridian line, twelve miles, thirty-six (chains), and forty-four links distance; thence west, at a right angle, twelve miles, thirty-six chains, and forty-four links distance; thence north, to the said specified parallel of latitude; thence east, with said parallel, to the place of beginning.
'I further state that the said land is entirely vacant, not claimed by any one, is not mineral, but located for purposes of arable and pastoral agriculture, and is within the limits of the territory of New Mexico as established in the organic act. I hereby accordingly make application for the survey and location of the tract of land in accordance with the provisions of the above act of congress.
John S. Watts,
'Attorney for Heirs of Luis Maria Baca.'
Prior to this time, the territory of Colorado had been organized, and a portion of the territory of New Mexico included within its boundaries, and the land described in this application was within the territory thus included in Colorado. The surveyor general of New Mexico, on the receint of this application, forwarded it to the land department at Washington, and also transmitted a copy to the surveyor general of Colorado. The surveyor general of Colorado, writing on February 24 1863, to the land department, informed it of the receipt of the copy above referred to, and at the close of his letter made this statement:
'I suppose this selection has been made by Ex-Governor Gilpin, as he told me last summer he was in possession of one of the Baca 'floats,' and should locate it as this is located, for the reason that, in his opinion, it would cover rich minerals in the mountains.'
In reply, the land department, on March 13, 1863, wrote as follows:
'You will also correspond with the register and receiver of Colorado, when they enter upon their official duties, communicating to them the substance of this communication, and call upon them to furnish their certificate, when able, under the same conditions that your own is to be furnished under, which, when received, you will forward to this office.'
During the year 1863, Ex-Governor Gilpin, who had become the owner, or at least interested in this location, made application to the surveyor general of Colorado for a survey of the tract. As the land was beyond the limits of the public surveys then completed, the surveyor general made a contract with Deputy Surveyor A. Z. Sheldon for its survey, and forwarded the same to the land department for approval. On November 2, 1863, that office wrote to the surveyor general disapproving of the contract, and adding:
'In your letter dated the 10th March last, transmitting the application of the attorney of said heirs for the location of this claim, you say: 'I suppose this selection has been made by Ex-Governor Gilpin, as he told me last summer he was in possession of one of the Baca floats, and should locate it as this is located, for the reason that, in his opinion, it would cover rich minerals in the mountains.'
'Upon receipt of your letter, you were expressly informed,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.
... ... value, and made the subjects of barter and sale. Lamb ... v. Davenport, 18 Wall. 307, 21 L.Ed. 759.' ... In ... Shaw v. Kellog, 170 U.S. 312, 332, 18 Sup.Ct. 632, 641, ... 42 L.Ed. 1050, 1057, the court discussed many questions which ... are directly applicable ... ...
-
Old Dominion Copper Min. & Smelting Co. v. Haverly
... ... are, in the absence of fraud, conclusive and binding upon the ... courts of the country. Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S ... 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050; Barden v. Northern Pac. R ... Co., supra; Johnson v. Drew, 171 U.S. 93, 18 S.Ct ... ...
-
American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, s. 92SA141
...661, 23 L.Ed. 998 (1876); Sanchez v. Taylor, 377 F.2d 733, 737 (10th Cir.1967). What followed is detailed in Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050 (1898). The surveyor general of the Territory of New Mexico was directed by proper federal authority to survey the Vegas Gr......
-
Stroup v. Matthews
... ... (U. S.) 212, 5 L.Ed. 437; Lindsay v. Miller, ... 6 Pet. (U. S.) 666, 8 L.Ed. 538; Ballance v ... Forsyth, 13 How. (U. S.) 18, 14 L.Ed. 32; Shaw v ... Kellog, 170 U.S. 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050; ... Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. (U. S.) 72, 20 L.Ed. 485.) ... Where ... ...
-
Table of Cases
...Ct. 1900, 128 L. Ed. 2d 716 (1994): 8.10(1) Rabe v. Washington, 405 U.S. 313, 92 S. Ct. 993, 31 L. Ed. 2d 258 (1972):12.5 Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312, 18 S. Ct. 632, 42 L. Ed. 1050 (1898): 20.4(2) Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U.S. 1, 14 S. Ct. 548, 38 L. Ed. 331 (1894): 18.2(3), 18.7(2) Suitum ......
-
Chapter 1 - § 1.2 • UNITED STATES GRANTS AND PATENTS
...289 P.2d 916 (Colo. 1955).[109] Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U.S. 392 (1885); Davis's Adm'r v. Weibbold, 139 U.S. 507 (1891); Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312 (1898).[110] Burke v. S. Pac. R.R. Co., 234 U.S. 669 (1914); Thomas v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 139 F. Supp. 588 (D. Colo. 1956) (Burke not "as ......
-
Chapter 1 - § 1.1 • MEXICAN GRANTS
...Rep. No. 228 at 3-4 . . . ; see also Lane v. Watts, 234 U.S. at 528 (referring to both grants as "confirmed"); but see Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312 . . . (1898) (speaking of the claim of the heirs of Baca to the Vegas Grandes, the court said, "Here there had been no claim confirmed to any ......
-
ACCESS TO MINERAL RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES: CONSIDERATION OF THE "NOT IN MY BASEMENT" PROBLEM
...13A, Special Institute on Surface Use of Mineral Development in the New West (Rocky Mt. Min. Law Fdn., 2008). [25] Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312 (1898); Burke v. Southern Pac. R.R. Co., 234 U.S. 669 (1914); Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U.S. 392 (1885); 1 American Law of Mining 2d § 12.04 at 12-1......