Shaw v. Kellogg

Decision Date02 May 1898
Docket NumberNo. 154,154
Citation42 L.Ed. 1050,170 U.S. 312,18 S.Ct. 632
PartiesSHAW v. KELLOGG
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

This was an action of ejectment brought in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Colorado on July 3, 1893, to recover possession of a certain tract in Saguache county, in the state of Colorado, described as follows:

'Section twenty-two (22), township one (1) north, one (1) east, according to the plat of said Baca Grant No. 4, as filed and recorded in the office of the county clerk and recorder of said Saguache county, and including in said section twenty-two, certain mineral-bearing property, designated by the defendant as the 'Eastern Star Mine,' with other mining lands adjacent thereto within said section twenty-two.'

After answer, a trial was had before a jury, which resulted in a verdict under instructions of the judge for defendant. Upon this verdict, judgment was entered, May 22, 1895. Thereupon the plaintiff sued out a writ of error from the circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit. On March 30, 1896, that court certified certain questions. Upon an examination of those questions, and after argument of counsel, this court, on December 22, 1897, ordered a certiorari to bring up the entire record, and upon such entire record the case was submitted for consideration.

The premises in question are within the limits of the so-called 'Baca Grant No. 4.' The plaintiff is the owner of that grant, and the question presented is as to the validity and extent of his title. Prior to the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo between Mexico and the United States, of date February 2, 1848, by which New Mexico and other territory in the southwest was ceded to this government, Mexico had made some quite extensive grants of tracts of land within the territory ceded. Since then congress has provided for the several portions of the ceded territory different modes of determining the validity and extent of those grants. By the act of July 22, 1854 (10 Stat. 308), the office of surveyor general for the territory of New Mexico was created; and, by section 8, it was made his duty to examine into all claims for lands within the limits of that territory, and to make full report thereof to congress. In pursuance of this authority, the surveyor general examined and reported upon various claims, and on June 21, 1860 (12 Stat. 71), congress passed an act confirming several of them. There were two opposing claimants for a large tract of land in the vicinity of the town of Las Vegas. In settling the dispute between them, congress enacted, in section 6:

'Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, that it shall be lawful for the heirs of Luis Maria Baca, who make claim to the said tract of land as is claimed by the town of Las Vegas, to select instead of the land claimed by them, an equal quantity of vacant land, not mineral, in the territory of New Mixico, to be located by them in square bodies, not exceeding five in number. And it shall be the duty of the surveyor general of New Mexico to make survey and location of the lands so selected by said heirs of Baca when thereunto required by them: provided, however, that the right hereby granted to said heirs of Baca shall continue in force during three years from the passage of this act, and no longer.'

On July 26, 1860, a letter of instructions was issued by the land department to the surveyor general of New Mexico in reference to these private land claims. In that letter, after directing a survey of the Las Vegas grant, and a determination of the area thereof, the instructions were as follows:

'The exact area of the Las Vegas town tract having been thus ascertained, the right will accrue to the Baca claimants to select a quantity equal to the area of the town tract elsewhere in New Mexico of vacant land, not mineral, in square bodies not exceeding five in number.

'You will furnish them with a certificate, transmitting at the same time a duplicate to this office, of their right and the area they are to select in five square parcels. Should they select in square forms according to the existing line of the public surveys, the matter may be properly disposed of by their application duly indorsed and signed with your certificate designating the parts selected by legal divisions or subdivisions, and so selected as to form five separate bodies in square form. Then the certificate thus indos ed is to be noted on the records of the register and receiver at Santa F e, and sent on here by those officers for approval. Should the Baca claimants select outside of the existing surveys, they must give such distinct descriptions and connection with natural objects in their applications to be filed in your office as will enable the deputy surveyor, when he may reach the vicinity of such selections in the regular progress of the surveys, to have the selections adjusted as near as may be to the lines of the public surveys, which may hereafter be established in the region of those selections.

'In either case the final condition of the certificate to this office must be accompanied by a statement from yourself and register and receiver that the land is vacant, and not mineral.'

The survey made of the grant to the town of Las Vegas showed an acreage of 496,446.96 acres, a certificate of which fact was given to the heirs of said Baca.

On December 12, 1862, the following selection was filed with the surveyor general of New Mexico:

'Santa F e, New Mexico, Dec. 12, 1862.

'To Surveyor General John A. Clark, Surveyor General of New Mexico: I, John S. Watts, attorney of the heirs of Luis Maria Baca, have this day selected, as one of the five locations belonging to the said heirs under the sixth section of the act of congress approved June 21, 1860, a tract of land in the territory of New Mexico, described as follows:

'Beginning at a point on the eastern edge of the valley of San Luis, where the thirty-eighth parallel of north latitude crosses the base of the snowy range, dividing the waters of the rivers Arkansas and Del Norte; thence east, along said parallel, four and one-half miles; thence south, along a meridian line, twelve miles, thirty-six (chains), and forty-four links distance; thence west, at a right angle, twelve miles, thirty-six chains, and forty-four links distance; thence north, to the said specified parallel of latitude; thence east, with said parallel, to the place of beginning.

'I further state that the said land is entirely vacant, not claimed by any one, is not mineral, but located for purposes of arable and pastoral agriculture, and is within the limits of the territory of New Mexico as established in the organic act. I hereby accordingly make application for the survey and location of the tract of land in accordance with the provisions of the above act of congress.

John S. Watts,

'Attorney for Heirs of Luis Maria Baca.'

Prior to this time, the territory of Colorado had been organized, and a portion of the territory of New Mexico included within its boundaries, and the land described in this application was within the territory thus included in Colorado. The surveyor general of New Mexico, on the receint of this application, forwarded it to the land department at Washington, and also transmitted a copy to the surveyor general of Colorado. The surveyor general of Colorado, writing on February 24 1863, to the land department, informed it of the receipt of the copy above referred to, and at the close of his letter made this statement:

'I suppose this selection has been made by Ex-Governor Gilpin, as he told me last summer he was in possession of one of the Baca 'floats,' and should locate it as this is located, for the reason that, in his opinion, it would cover rich minerals in the mountains.'

In reply, the land department, on March 13, 1863, wrote as follows:

'It is necessary, before the application can be approved by this office, that it be accompanied by the certificates of the surveyor general and the register and receiver that the land selected is vacant, and not mineral. This is in accordance with our instructions to the surveyor general of New Mexico, extracts from which were furnished your office in our communication of June 7, 1862; especially should the character of the location as to minerals be carefully ascertained after the important statement of Ex-Governor Gilpin, which you communicatedi n your official letter to this office. Whenever you shall acquire good and satisfactory information that the lands included in this selection are vacant and not mineral, to enable you to do, you will transmit to this office your official certificate setting forth these facts.

'You will also correspond with the register and receiver of Colorado, when they enter upon their official duties, communicating to them the substance of this communication, and call upon them to furnish their certificate, when able, under the same conditions that your own is to be furnished under, which, when received, you will forward to this office.'

During the year 1863, Ex-Governor Gilpin, who had become the owner, or at least interested in this location, made application to the surveyor general of Colorado for a survey of the tract. As the land was beyond the limits of the public surveys then completed, the surveyor general made a contract with Deputy Surveyor A. Z. Sheldon for its survey, and forwarded the same to the land department for approval. On November 2, 1863, that office wrote to the surveyor general disapproving of the contract, and adding:

'In your letter dated the 10th March last, transmitting the application of the attorney of said heirs for the location of this claim, you say: 'I suppose this selection has been made by Ex-Governor Gilpin, as he told me last summer he was in possession of one of the Baca floats, and should locate it as this is located, for the reason that, in his opinion, it would cover rich minerals in the mountains.'

'Upon receipt of your letter, you were expressly informed,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 15 November 1901
    ... ... value, and made the subjects of barter and sale. Lamb ... v. Davenport, 18 Wall. 307, 21 L.Ed. 759.' ... In ... Shaw v. Kellog, 170 U.S. 312, 332, 18 Sup.Ct. 632, 641, ... 42 L.Ed. 1050, 1057, the court discussed many questions which ... are directly applicable ... ...
  • Old Dominion Copper Min. & Smelting Co. v. Haverly
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 25 May 1907
    ... ... are, in the absence of fraud, conclusive and binding upon the ... courts of the country. Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S ... 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050; Barden v. Northern Pac. R ... Co., supra; Johnson v. Drew, 171 U.S. 93, 18 S.Ct ... ...
  • American Water Development, Inc. v. City of Alamosa, s. 92SA141
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 9 May 1994
    ...661, 23 L.Ed. 998 (1876); Sanchez v. Taylor, 377 F.2d 733, 737 (10th Cir.1967). What followed is detailed in Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050 (1898). The surveyor general of the Territory of New Mexico was directed by proper federal authority to survey the Vegas Gr......
  • Stroup v. Matthews
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 4 April 1927
    ... ... (U. S.) 212, 5 L.Ed. 437; Lindsay v. Miller, ... 6 Pet. (U. S.) 666, 8 L.Ed. 538; Ballance v ... Forsyth, 13 How. (U. S.) 18, 14 L.Ed. 32; Shaw v ... Kellog, 170 U.S. 312, 18 S.Ct. 632, 42 L.Ed. 1050; ... Johnson v. Towsley, 13 Wall. (U. S.) 72, 20 L.Ed. 485.) ... Where ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • ACCESS TO MINERAL RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES: CONSIDERATION OF THE "NOT IN MY BASEMENT" PROBLEM
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute International Mining and Oil and Gas Law, Development, and Investment (FNREL) 2013 edition
    • Invalid date
    ...13A, Special Institute on Surface Use of Mineral Development in the New West (Rocky Mt. Min. Law Fdn., 2008). [25] Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312 (1898); Burke v. Southern Pac. R.R. Co., 234 U.S. 669 (1914); Deffeback v. Hawke, 115 U.S. 392 (1885); 1 American Law of Mining 2d § 12.04 at 12-1......
  • A theory of adjudication: law as magic.
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 4, September 2008
    • 22 September 2008
    ...of legal ownership, explaining, "There is no magic in the word 'patent,' or in the instrument which the word defines." Shaw v. Kellogg, 170 U.S. 312, 341 (1898); see also Burke v. S. Pac. R.R. Co., 234 U.S. 669, 704 (1914); supra note 8 (citing further (74.) See Green, supra note 6, at 1016......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT