Shaw v. Shaw, 97-1723
| Citation | 696 So.2d 391 |
| Decision Date | 06 June 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-1723,97-1723 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | 22 Fla. L. Weekly D1414 Samuel SHAW, Appellant, v. Elizabeth SHAW, Appellee. |
This is an appeal by Samuel Shaw (the husband) from a non-final order entered ex parte on April 15, 1997, which granted Elizabeth Shaw (the wife) temporary primary residential custody of the parties' minor child and allowed her to temporarily relocate out of state. The husband also appeals a subsequent order of May 1, 1997, which set an evidentiary hearing for June 10, 1997 on the propriety of the wife's relocation.
Pursuant to the husband's motion, we expedited review. 1 We reverse the non-final order entered April 15, 1997 because the trial court erred in granting the wife's emergency motion without affording the husband notice or an opportunity to be heard.
The gist of the wife's emergency motion, filed with her petition for dissolution, was that she had accepted employment in Louisiana at a salary far in excess of her present earnings and her position in Louisiana was to start immediately. The motion did not reflect service on the husband nor reflect any reason why he could not or should not be served.
Under extraordinary circumstances, a trial court may enter an order granting a motion for temporary custody of a child without affording prior notice to the opposing party or an opportunity to be heard. Loudermilk v. Loudermilk, 693 So.2d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). A true emergency situation might arise where, for example, a child is threatened with physical harm or is about to be improperly removed from the state. See Gielchinsky v. Gielchinsky, 662 So.2d 732, 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Loudermilk; see also Wilson v. Roseberry, 669 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Without prior notice and an opportunity to be heard, a litigant's due process rights are violated. See Roque v. Paskow, 693 So.2d 999 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Gielchinsky; Wilson.
In this case, the facts do not indicate that a true emergency or extraordinary circumstances existed to justify a lack of prior notice to the husband. The facts certainly do not indicate a true emergency to justify the entry of an order ex parte. There is no allegation that the husband threatened harm to the minor child. In addition, at the time the order was entered, husband's contrary emergency motion to prevent the child's removal was also pending. The fact that the error may be cured by the upcoming hearing on June 10th does not eliminate the error in entering the April 15th order.
We wholeheartedly concur with the observations of Judge Antoon in Wilson wherein he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Deal v. Deal
...relations matter and may be appealed pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (addressing an appeal by the husband from a non-final order which granted the wife temporary primary residential custody of th......
-
Shaw v. Shaw, SC00-1577.
...in entering the original order was compounded by a delay of almost two months in setting an evidentiary hearing. See Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). As the case proceeded in the trial court, much of the controversy was centered upon access to the child, who had been removed......
-
Fee v. Usler, 5D99-2306.
...to one of the parties, or with insufficient notice, or with insufficient opportunity to be heard, must be reversed); Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (reversing ex parte order transferring temporary custody to wife and allowing her to relocate out of state on basis that she h......
-
Stanley-Baker v. Baker, 4D00-1573.
...party temporary custody of a child without affording prior notice to the opposing party or an opportunity to be heard. Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So.2d 391, 392 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (citation omitted); accord Brouard v. McLean, 753 So.2d 601, 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Simmons v. Simmons, 698 So.2d 947......
-
Emergencies and case management conference
...where father improperly removed the child to the United Kingdom for the summer and had not returned the child to Florida); Shaw v. Shaw , 696 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(error to enter ex parte order granting wife temporary custody of child and allowing wife to temporarily locate out of ......
-
Temporary relief
...written notice of hearing, with wife attending without counsel receiving only two hours advance notice by telephone); Shaw v. Shaw, 696 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (error to enter ex parte order granting wife temporary custody of child and allowing wife to temporarily locate out of state......