Sheehan v. Board of Appeals of Saugus

Decision Date04 February 1955
Citation124 N.E.2d 253,332 Mass. 188
PartiesJohn J. SHEEHAN v. BOARD OF APPEALS OF SAUGUS and another
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Joseph J. Padellaro, Boston, for petitioner.

Albion L. Hogan, Town Counsel, Lynn, for respondents.

Before QUA, C. J., and RONAN, WILKINS, SPALDING and WILLIAMS, JJ.

WILKINS, Justice.

The plaintiff is the owner of premises in Saugus in an area zoned for single residences. He applied to the board of appeals of the town for a variance to enable him to operate a kennel for the keeping of greyhounds. In a decision of the board he was granted a temporary variance for 60 days only. By way of appeal from that decision he brought this bill in equity under G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 40, § 30, as appearing in St.1933, c. 269, § 1, as amended. The Superior Court entered a final decree granting a permanent variance on condition that the plaintiff's dogs should not be permitted to leave the premises except for transportation to Wonderland Park, Revere, or 'beyond the confines of Massachusetts.' The board and the superintendent of buildings appeal to this court.

The decree of the Superior Court was erroneous. The case is governed by our recent decision in Pendergast v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, 331 Mass. 555, 120 N.E.2d 916, where the paragraph numbered 3 in c. 40, § 30, is analyzed at length. It is there pointed out that no one has a legal right to a variance, that the paragraph numbered 3 gives a person on certain conditions an opportunity to go before the board of appeals, and that if the board decides adversely to him he commonly has no right enforceable in court, 331 Mass. at page 557, 120 N.E.2d 916. Cefalo v. Board of Appeal of Boston, Mass., 124 N.E.2d 247.

Elaborate statement of the facts is unnecessary. The judge found that the plaintiff is a trainer and breeder of racing greyhounds of which at the time of the hearing he had between 18 and 25 housed in his barn. For 7 years he had maintained such dogs on the premises notwithstanding the zoning by-law. There is nothing in the findings of the judge to show that the board was under any legal compulsion to grant the variance.

The decree is reversed and a decree is to be entered stating that the decision of the board of appeals of Saugus did not exceed its authority, that no modification of its decision is required, and that the clerk of the court within 30 days after the entry of the decree send an attested copy...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Meadows v. Town Clerk of Saugus
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1956
    ...'Other Data right hand side of Walnut St. going toward Lynnfield--Bd. of Appeals variance--6 mos.' See, Sheehan v. Board of Appeals of Saugus, 332 Mass. 188, 124 N.E.2d 253. Both petitioners made application for a license for the year beginning April 1, 1955, but were refused on the ground ......
  • Mioduszewski v. Town of Saugus
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1958
    ...a greyhound kennel on these or similar premises in Saugus has been before this court twice previously. Sheehan v. Board of Appeals of Saugus, 332 Mass. 188, 124 N.E.2d 253; Meadows v. Town Clerk of Saugus, 333 Mass. 760, 133 N.E.2d 498. See also Marotta v. Board of Appeals of Revere, Mass.,......
  • Gem Properties, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Milton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1960
    ...building purpose. See Pendergast v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, 331 Mass. 555, 557-560, 120 N.E.2d 916; Sheehan v. Board of Appeals of Saugus, 332 Mass. 188, 189, 124 N.E.2d 253. Cf. McHugh v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Boston, 336 Mass. 682, 690, 147 N.E.2d 761. It, however, must be......
  • Flynn v. Hurley
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1955
    ... ... Winship v. Boston, 201 Mass. 273, 275, 87 N.E. 600; Sullivan v. Saugus, 305 Mass. 127, 130-131, 25 N.E.2d 185. Can it be said that the evidence ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT