Sheffield v. Dean

Decision Date16 October 1926
Docket Number17145.
Citation135 S.E. 109,36 Ga.App. 56
PartiesSHEFFIELD v. DEAN.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

Where a bill of sale to secure a debt described the property as "30 head of horses now located at the residence of said B. S. Jones [the maker], in the twelfth district of Miller county, Georgia," the description was so vague and indefinite that the record of the instrument was, as a matter of law, insufficient to give constructive notice to a purchaser of a part of the property from one other than the maker. Nussbaum v. Waterman & Co., 9 Ga.App. 56 (3), 70 S.E. 259; Reynolds v. Tifton Co., 20 Ga.App. 49 (1), 92 S.E. 389; Ellis v. Lynch, 28 Ga.App. 529, 112 S.E. 151; Hicks v. Walker Co., 31 Ga.App. 395 (2), 120 S.E. 694; Nix. v. Citizens' Bank, 34 Ga.App. 546 (2), 130 S.E. 597.

The above ruling controls all the special grounds of the motion for new trial adversely to the plaintiff in error. The evidence authorized the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Error from City Court of Miller County; W. I. Geer, Judge.

Suit between E. M. Sheffield and Alice Dean. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Affirmed.

N. L. Stapleton, of Colquitt, for plaintiff in error.

P. Z. Geer, of Colquitt, for defendant in error.

BELL, J.

Judgment affirmed.

JENKINS, P.J., and STEPHENS, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT