Shelbourne Garage, Inc. v. Licht

Decision Date13 March 1970
Citation34 A.D.2d 563,309 N.Y.S.2d 850
PartiesSHELBOURNE GARAGE, INC., Respondent, v. Louis W. LICHT, et al., Defendants, S. Jerome Levey, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

S. Jerome Levey, Forest Hills, outgoing attorney and appellant pro se.

Dinkes, Mandel & Dinkes, New York City, incoming attorneys for plaintiff.

Before BELDOCK, P.J., and RABIN, CHRIST, HOPKINS and BRENNAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover money damages, in which plaintiff has discharged its attorney, the latter appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 4, 1969, as, upon his motion to fix his compensation, determined (1) that the amount be fixed by the trial court or upon motion after the outcome of the action and (2) that he surrender papers and property to the attorneys replacing him.

Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for a hearing before and determination by the court upon the issues of the reasonable value of the services rendered by appellant and whether, under all the circumstances, payment of the fee so fixed should be made immediately or deferred. No questions of fact have been considered.

When a client discharges his attorney without cause, the attorney is entitled to have his compensation determined in a fixed dollar amount, presently payable or secured by a lien on the cause of action, based on the reasonable value of his services (Martucci v. Brooklyn Children's Aid Soc., 284 N.Y. 408, 31 N.E.2d 506; Matter of Tillman, 259 N.Y. 133, 136, 181 N.E. 75, 76; Reubenbaum v. B. & H. Express, Inc., 6 A.D.2d 47, 48, 174 N.Y.S.2d 287, 289--290; cf. Roskind v. Brown, 29 A.D.2d 549, 550, 285 N.Y.S.2d 410, 411--412). Whether the fee so fixed shall be paid immediately or deferred until the outcome of the action rests in the sound discretion of the court (Friedman v. Gordon, 260 App.Div. 1023, 23 N.Y.S.2d 757, affd. 285 N.Y. 630, 33 N.E.2d 555; Adams v. Legett, 15 A.D.2d 856, 857, 224 N.Y.S.2d 584, 585).

CHRIST, HOPKINS and BRENNAN, JJ., concur.

BELDOCK, P.J., and SAMUEL RABIN, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order insofar as appealed from (Friedman v. Gordon, 260 App.Div. 1023, 23 N.Y.S.2d 757, affd. 285 N.Y. 630, 33 N.E.2d 55).

As we read the Friedman case it stands for the proposition that while a discharged attorney has the right to a determination of whether or not h...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Joel R. Brandes, P.C. v. Zingmond
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • July 10, 1991
    ...(see, Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979 [489 N.Y.S.2d 36, 478 N.E.2d 177]; Ventola v Ventola, 112 AD2d 291, 292 ; Shelbourne Garage v Licht, 34 AD2d 563 ." (Theroux v. Theroux, 145 A.D.2d 625, 626, 536 N.Y.S.2d That the plaintiff herein was discharged before initiating litigation......
  • Theroux v. Theroux
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 1988
    ...64 N.Y.2d 977, 979, 489 N.Y.S.2d 36, 478 N.E.2d 177; Ventola v. Ventola, 112 A.D.2d 291, 292, 491 N.Y.S.2d 736; Shelbourne Garage v. Licht, 34 A.D.2d 563, 309 N.Y.S.2d 850). Additionally, an attorney's rendition of services and expenditure of disbursements on behalf of a client entitles him......
  • Pudalov v. Brogan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 10, 1980
    ...presently payable or secured by a lien in the cause of action, based on the reasonable value of his services.' (Shelbourne Garage v. Licht, 34 A.D.2d 563, 309 N.Y.S.2d 850 and cases cited therein)." (emphasis supplied) (358 N.Y.S.2d at p. Here, the client contends that the plaintiff was dis......
  • Hom v. Hom
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 12, 1994
    ...payable or secured by a lien on the cause of action rests in the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Shelbourne Garage v. Licht, 34 A.D.2d 563, 309 N.Y.S.2d 850). Here, the appellant moved the court to fix its charging lien, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475, at $8,883.80. This amount w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT