Shelbyville Water & Light Co. v. McDade
Decision Date | 18 April 1906 |
Citation | 92 S.W. 568,122 Ky. 639 |
Parties | SHELBYVILLE WATER & LIGHT CO. v. McDADE. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County.
"To be officially reported."
Action by R. L. McDade against the Shelbyville Water & Light Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Willis & Todd, for appellant.
Beard & Marshall, for appellee.
The livery stable of R. L. McDade in Shelbyville was burned on May 11, 1904, and he brought this action against the Shelbyville Water & Light Company to recover for the loss, on the ground that it occurred by reason of the company's failure to have a supply of water in its mains as required by its contract with the city. The material part of the contract is contained in the following sections of the city ordinances:
The proof for the plaintiff on the trial showed that the second story of the livery stable had a large quantity of hay and straw stored in it; that there was a water pipe leading up from the first to the second story, with a place to attach a hose on each floor, and the hose was kept on a reel near by both above and below. The water was turned on by means of a switch, and the evidence is a little confused as to how this worked; that is, whether it could be turned on from the upper floor alone, or whether it had to be first turned on below. When the alarm of fire was given, McDade went up to the second floor and undertook to attach the hose and turn on the water. The testimony for him is to the effect that the fire then was small, and could...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Collier v. Newport Water, Light and Power Co.
-
Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Tauer
...(1871) L. R. 6 Ex. 404; Phœnix Ins. Co. v. N. Y. Cent. Ry. Co. (1907) 122 App. Div. 113, 106 N. Y. Supp. 696;Shelbyville, etc., Co. v. McDade (1906) 122 Ky. 639, 92 S. W. 568;Byrd v. English (1903) 117 Ga. 191, 43 S. E. 419, 64 L. R. A. 94, and note; White v. Colorado, etc., R. Co., 5 Dill.......
-
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago And St. Louis Railway Company v. Tauer
... ... an adequate water system, with hydrants located conveniently ... to the greenhouse, and the ... Co ... (1907), 122 A.D. 113, 106 N.Y.S. 696; Shelbyville Water, ... etc., Co. v. McDade (1906), 122 Ky. 639, 92 ... S.W. 568; ... ...
-
Lebanon, Louisville & Lex. Tel. Co. v. Lanham Lumber Co.
...is fixed by special contract, and a recovery is allowed because of the breach thereof, as in Shelbyville Water & Light Company v. McDade, 122 Ky. 639, 92 S. W. 568, 29 Ky. Law Rep. 119, and similar cases. In the cases of Metallic Compression Casting Company v. Pittsburg, etc., Railway Compa......