Shell Oil Co. v. Superior Court

Decision Date06 August 1975
Citation123 Cal.Rptr. 307,50 Cal.App.3d 489
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesSHELL OIL COMPANY and Donald T. Gallagher, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California FOR the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent; William KOUBRATOFF, Real Party in Interest. Civ. 46684.

McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Franklin H. Wilson, Peter W. James, and W. Alexander Davis, II, Los Angeles, for petitioners.

David Laufer, Northridge, for real party in interest.

No appearance for respondent.

THOMPSON, Associate Justice.

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1987, subdivision (c), real party in interest, on June 10, 1975, served by mail upon petitioners a request to produce persons, books, documents, and 'other things' at a trial set for July 10, 1975. On June 20, 1975, petitioners served and filed objections to the request to produce. Real party in interest moved to strike petitioners' objections, contending that they were not filed within the time provided by section 1987. On July 7, 1975, respondent superior court ruled that petitioners' objections were not timely and ordered compliance with the request to produce. We issued our alternative writ to review the ruling for the reasons stated in California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court (Rosen, Real Party in Interest), Cal.App., 123 Cal.Rptr. 304 filed concurrently with this opinion.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1987, subdivision (a), states the manner of service of a subpena. Subdivision (b) of section 1987 provides for a notice to appear as a substitute for a subpena in the case of parties of record to a civil action and similarly situated persons. Subdivision (c) of section 1987 states in part: 'If the notice specified in subdivision (b) is served at least 20 days before the time required for attendance, or within such shorter time as the court may order, it may include a request that such party or person bring with him books, documents or other things. . . . Within five days thereafter, or such other period as the court may allow, the party or person of whom the request is made may serve and file written objections to the request or any part thereof, with a statement of grounds. Thereafter, upon noticed motion of the requesting party, accompanied by a showing of good cause and of materiality of the items to the issues, the court may order production of items to which objection was made, unless the objecting party or person establishes good cause for nonproduction or production under limitations or conditions. . . .'

Code of Civil Procedure section 1013 provides that where 'notice or other paper' is served by mail, service is complete when the document is posted but 'if, within a given number of days after such service, a right may be exercised, or an act is to be done by the adverse party, the time within which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Highland Plastics, Inc. v. Enders
    • United States
    • California Superior Court
    • 24 Junio 1980
    ...Shearer v. Superior Court (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 424, 138 Cal.Rptr. 824 (petition for writ of mandamus); Shell Oil v. Superior Court (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 489, 123 Cal.Rptr. 307 (pretrial discovery motion); California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 483, 123 Cal.Rptr. 304......
  • Eckstine v. Moores
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 18 Septiembre 2018
    ...that the trial court considered and weighed the potential for overlitigation by Father. 10. Mother relies on Shell Oil Co. v. Superior Court (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 489 to argue that a request for additional time to object must be made within five days. In Shell, the requesting party moved to ......
  • Richards v. Miller
    • United States
    • California Superior Court
    • 2 Abril 1980
    ...by mail. (California Accounts v. Superior Court (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 483, 487, 123 Cal.Rptr. 304; see also Shell Oil v. Superior Court (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 489, 123 Cal.Rptr. 307.) In Shearer v. Superior Court (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 424, 138 Cal.Rptr. 824, it was held that the time to file a ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT