Shelton v. Silverfield
Decision Date | 27 January 1900 |
Citation | 56 S.W. 1023,104 Tenn. 67 |
Parties | SHELTON, County Clerk, v. SILVERFIELD et al. ETTERMAN v. SHELTON, County Clerk. |
Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Error to circuit court, Davidson county; J. W. Bonner, Judge.
Silverfield & Feldman, pawnbroker, paid under protest a state tax imposed on dealers in secondhand clothing, and sued P. A. Shelton clerk of the county court, to recover it. For that paid to the county, certiorari and supersedeas was obtained. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Action by H. Etterman against P. A. Shelton, clerk of the county court, to recover a tax imposed on dealers in secondhand clothing, paid under protest. Judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Both cases heard together. Judgment in the first case affirmed, and in the second case reversed.
Lellyett & Barr, for plaintiffs J. A. Cartwright, for defendant.
In the first of the above-styled cases the defendants in error Silverfield & Feldman, are pawnbrokers in the city of Nashville, and as such have paid the pawnbroker's privilege tax required by the act of 1899, and were regularly licensed to do business as such. By an agreed statement of facts (that is, facts set out in defendants in error's petition for certiorari and supersedeas) it is shown that the regular course and practice of the business engaged in by the defendants in error are to loan money on articles pawned as security therefor, and to sell such articles when the time for redemption expires, if the debt is not paid, and, in the event of purchasing to save the debt, to sell again the articles that are or may be pledged, which are as numerous in variety as the kinds of personalty that admit of ownership and value, both first and second hand, including among the several classifications precious stones, jewelry, timepieces furniture, clothing or wearing apparel, utensils, etc. The plaintiff in error, being the clerk of the county court of Davidson county, through proper officials demanded (and issued a distraint warrant therefor against them) the additional privilege tax on dealers in secondhand clothing or wearing apparel, under section 4 of the act of 1899, imposing a privilege tax, etc. The defendants in error paid the tax (under protest) that was claimed by the state, and sued for it back, and obtained certiorari and supersedeas for that of the county. By agreement the motion to dismiss the petition was heard by the court, as also, at the same time, the merits of the case.
The revenue act of 1899 (chapter 432) provides: By section 4 privilege taxes are fixed as follows:
It is insisted by the plaintiff in error the clerk of the county court that under the act of 1899, above cited, the defendant in error is not only a merchant and pawnbroker, but is also a dealer in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of St. Louis v. Baskowitz
...junk merchant's tax also is an attempt of double taxation. In support of this contention we are cited to the following cases: Etterman v. Shelton, 104 Tenn. 67; of Newport v. Fitzer, 115 S.W. 742; Kansas City v. Grush, supra. This last case, as heretofore shown, has no application to the fa......
-
Foster & Creighton Co. v. Graham
... ... 72, 224 S.W. 168; Jenkins v. Ewin, 8 Heisk. 473; ... Friedman Bros. v. Mathes, 8 Heisk. 488; Kelly v ... Dwyer, 7 Lea, 180; Shelton v. Silverfield, 104 ... Tenn. 71, 56 S.W. 1023; American Steel & Wire Co. v ... Speed, 110 Tenn. 547, 75 S.W. 1037, 100 Am. St. Rep ... 814; ... ...
-
Wilson v. State
... ... mode in its discretion. Jenkins v. Ewin, 8 Heisk ... 473; Friedman v. Mathes, 8 Heisk. 489; Kelly v ... Dwyer, 7 Lea, 190; Shelton v. Silverfield, 104 ... Tenn. 71, 56 S.W. 1023; Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, ... 110 Tenn. 547, 75 S.W. 1037, 100 Am. St. Rep. 814; ... Trentham v ... ...
-
Securities Inv. Co. v. Cobb
... ... properly connected with the business for which it has been ... licensed. The holding in this court in Shelton v ... Silverfield, 104 Tenn. 67, 56 S.W. 1023, is cited as ... authority for the contention made by the company. That was a ... case arising ... ...