Shelton v. State
Decision Date | 24 February 1987 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 99 |
Parties | Michael E. SHELTON v. STATE |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Paul D. Brown, Mobile, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen. and Jean Alexandra Webb, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
On April 26, 1985, the appellant and a cohort approached a man and a woman who were walking towards their car in a parking lot. The appellant hit the man in the head, demanded the car keys, and he and his partner drove off in the couple's car. The next night the appellant and his cohort, in another parking lot, approached the victim in this case and said, "Hold it right there, Rich." The victim saw a gun in the appellant's hand, turned, and ran towards a store. While running, he saw the appellant raise the gun, point it at him, and fire. He was slightly wounded in the shoulder. The appellant then ran to the stolen car, where his partner was waiting, and they drove off. This entire episode was also witnessed by a Mr. Wynne, a United States probation and parole officer.
A week later, the stolen car was observed being driven by the appellant Shelton. He was later arrested, and the keys for the stolen car were found in his pocket. A .22-caliber revolver was found inside the car. He was convicted of first degree robbery and attempted first degree assault, receiving concurrent 25- and 20-year sentences, respectively.
The appellant, a black male, argues that he was denied a fair trial by the state's systematically excluding black veniremen from the jury and cites Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). In this case, the state used eight of its nine strikes to strike black members of the venire. When the state strikes black members of the venire and the defendant is also black, the state must provide a race-neutral reason for its actions. Id. The state has not offered such a reason. Therefore, pursuant to our decision in Smith v. State, [Ms. 6 Div. 5, February 10, 1987] --- So.2d ---- (Ala.Cr.App.1987), we remand this case to the trial court in order for the prosecutor to come forward with race-neutral explanations of his strikes. If the state fails in establishing a race-neutral explanation, a new trial
is to be granted for the appellant. However, should the circuit court find that a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination did not occur, then a return shall be filed with this court containing the evidence of the hearing and the judge's findings resulting therefrom.
Appellant claims double jeopardy because, he says, the assault and robbery arose from the same occurrence. The elements of robbery had all occurred when he made the demand and threatened the victim with the weapon. The attempted first degree assault occurred as the victim was escaping. Although a single crime cannot be split up into multiple offenses, O'Neal v. State, 461 So.2d 54 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), nevertheless, "[W]hen the same conduct ... may establish the commission of more than one offense, the defendant may be prosecuted for each such offense." Section 13A-8-8(b), Code of Alabama 1975. Here, the appellant even had two acts.
Evidence of the earlier robbery during which the car was obtained was admissible to show a common plan or design. C. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence, § 69.01(6) (3d ed. 1977).
Appellant claims that the proper predicate was not laid for admitting into evidence the co-defendant's statement. This issue, presented for the first time on appeal, is not reviewable.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
All the Judges concur.
ON RETURN TO REMAND
The Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Alabama conducted a hearing in full accord with the requirements of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987). The trial court entered the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sockwell v. State
...from pretrial publicity related to the facts of the case to be tried is a race-neutral reason for a strike. See Shelton v. State, 521 So.2d 1035 (Ala.Crim.App.1987), cert. denied, 521 So.2d 1038 (Ala.1988). Unlike other veniremembers, E.D. appeared to be less than candid in regard to his ex......
-
Knight v. State, CR-93-1974
...elements of robbery had all occurred when [the appellant] made the demand and threatened the victim with a weapon." Shelton v. State, 521 So.2d 1035, 1037 (Ala.Cr.App.1987), cert. denied, 521 So.2d 1038 (Ala.1988). Alleging thefts of different items in separate counts does not convert a sin......
-
Warner v. State, 3 Div. 945
...71, 72-73 (8th Cir.1989) (prosecutor considered several factors, including residence in defendant's neighborhood); Shelton v. State, 521 So.2d 1035, 1038 (Ala.Cr.App.1987), cert. denied, 521 So.2d 1038 (Ala.1988) (a former assistant district attorney had previously resided in the area and "......
-
Christianson v. State
...781, 783 (Ala.Cr.App.1987) (no racial animus found when State struck both blacks and whites who were unemployed); Shelton v. State, 521 So.2d 1035, 1037-38 (Ala.Cr.App.1987) (same), cert. denied, 521 So.2d 1038 The State intentionally left one black on the jury who was single but who owned ......