Shelton v. State
| Decision Date | 04 February 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 22767,22767 |
| Citation | 140 S.E.2d 839,220 Ga. 610 |
| Parties | Jay P. SHELTON v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Wesley Asinof, Chester E. Wallace, F. L. Breen, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
William T. Boyd, Sol. Gen., J. Robert Sparks, J. Walter LeCraw, William Hall, Jr., Atlanta, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
The Court of Appeals has certified to this court a question of law as follows: 'Where the trial court, at the request of the defendant, has invoked the rule of sequestration of witnesses and required that all witnesses be examined out of the hearing of each other (Code § 38-1703), and the defendant thereafter seeks to call as a witness a person who has remained in the courtroom as a spectator, is the testimony of such witness admissible over the objection of the State?'
The question is answered in the affirmative. Rooks v. State, 65 Ga. 330; Lassiter v. State, 67 Ga. 739; May v. State, 90 Ga. 793, 800, 17 S.E. 108; McWhorter v. State, 118 Ga. 55(6), 44 S.E. 873; Phillips v. State, 121 Ga. 358(3), 49 S.E. 290; Wallace v. Mize, 153 Ga. 374, 388, 112 S.E. 724; Best v. State, 176 Ga. 46, 48, 166 S.E. 772; McCartney v. McCartney, 217 Ga. 200(7), 121 S.E.2d 785; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga.App. 615, 67 S.E. 707; Edwards v. State, 55 Ga.App. 187(1), 189 S.E. 678. Art. I, Sec. I, Par. V of the Georgia Constitution and the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The pronouncements of Etheridge v. Hobbs, 77 Ga. 531, 534, 3 S.E. 251, Pergason v. Etcherson, 91 Ga. 785(3), 18 S.E. 29, and Cunningham v. State, 97 Ga. 214, 22 S.E. 954, some of which deal with the consequences of a witness wilfully disobeying the order of sequestration and others with waiver of the right to use a witness under stated circumstances, do not require a contrary conclusion from that we have expressed in giving an affirmative answer to the question. In so far as Bird v. State, 50 Ga. 585, 588, is in conflict with what is ruled here, the same is unsound and is overruled.
Certified question answered in the affirmative.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Elliott v. State
...(unsworn) statement at trial. See, e.g., Bird v. State, 50 Ga. 585, 589 (7) (1874), overruled on other grounds by Shelton v. State, 220 Ga. 610, 610, 140 S.E.2d 839 (1965).In addition, the increased availability of defense counsel strengthened the right against compelled self-incrimination,......
-
Stephen W. Brown Radiology Associates v. Gowers
...who has violated the rule of sequestration is admissible although he may be guilty of contempt. See in this connection Shelton v. State, 220 Ga. 610, 140 S.E.2d 839, and cases cited therein; Dudley v. State, 148 Ga.App. 560, 562-563, 251 S.E.2d 815; Watts v. State, 239 Ga. 725, 731, 238 S.E......
-
Jordan v. State
...See McElvoy v. State, 154 Ga.App. 638, 269 S.E.2d 497 (1980), and cases cited in the three opinions in that case. In Shelton v. State, 220 Ga. 610, 140 S.E.2d 839 (1965), the court, in answer to a certified question, held that where witnesses in a criminal case have been sequestered, and th......
-
Dudley v. State, 56667
...464, 162 S.E.2d 338; McWhorter v. State, 118 Ga. 55(6), 44 S.E. 873; Phillips v. State, 121 Ga. 358(3), 49 S.E. 290; Shelton v. State, 220 Ga. 610, 140 S.E.2d 839; Dye v. State, 220 Ga. 113(2), 115, 137 S.E.2d 465. The trial court erred, in excluding the testimony of the alibi witness. The ......