Shepard's Point Land Co. v. Atlantic Hotel
Decision Date | 05 May 1903 |
Citation | 44 S.E. 39,132 N.C. 517 |
Parties | SHEPARD'S POINT LAND CO. v. ATLANTIC HOTEL. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Carteret County; Geo. H. Brown, Judge.
Action by the Shepard's Point Land Company against Atlantic Hotel. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
C. L Abernethy, Simmons & Ward, and Armistead, Jones & Son, for appellant.
W. W Clark and Lindsay Patterson, for appellee.
The plaintiff brings this action for recovery of possession of a tract of land described in the complaint as "lying and being situate in the county of Carteret, in Morehead City adjoining the square on which the hotel building of the defendant is located, and known and described as 'Square No. 83' in the plan of Morehead City." It alleges that the defendant is in possession of the above-described lot, "upon which there has been erected certain walks wharves, bathhouses, pavilion, etc., and that such possession is unlawful and wrongful."
The defendant denies that the plaintiff is the owner of the property described in the complaint, and denies that it is in possession thereof, except that it has a wharf, walkway, and two bathhouses leading from the rear of said hotel over and into the waters of Bogue Sound. It avers "that Bogue Sound is an arm of the sea, navigable for sea vessels and other ships, and the said hotel is about a mile from the Atlantic Ocean; the tide from said ocean ebbs and flows daily in said sound and upon the shore whereon the said hotel is located, and the space between the said hotel and bathhouses and where the walkway and wharf are situated is covered by the waters of said sound, and the defendant is advised that the plaintiff has no title thereto."
The plaintiff claims the land, which is covered by water, described in the complaint, and known in the plan and on the map of Morehead City as "Square No. 83," under the following chain of title, to wit: Grant from the state to John M. Morehead and W. L. Arendell, bearing date May 2, 1856. The grant is made to said grantees, "owners and riparian proprietors of the lands known as the 'Shepard's Point Lands' on Beaufort Harbor." It includes the tract or parcel of land lying around Shepard's Point lands, and between high-water mark and the deep water of Bogue Sound, Newport river, and Calico creek. The description in the grant covers 502 acres of land, and surrounds the lands known as the "Shepard's Point Lands," which by the charter of Morehead City embraces the entire water front of the said city, and runs out from high-water mark on the shores of said lands to the deep water of said sound, river, and creek. The Shepard's Point Land Company was chartered by chapter 136, p. 164, Laws 1856-57. The charter was extended by chapter 50, p. 100, Acts 1887. The town of Morehead City was incorporated by chapter 172, p. 203, Laws 1860-61. Section 6 provided "that the corporate limits of said city shall embrace the entire plan of the city of Morehead as published by the Shepard's Point Land Company, and from the terminus of the Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad Company to Fifteenth street."
The plaintiff introduced deeds tending to show that at the time of issuing the grant, May 24, 1856, the grantees were the owners of square No. 1, and that said square was abutting square No. 83, the latter being the water front covered by water and extending out into Bogue Sound. The plaintiff offered deeds tending to show that the defendant company had acquired title by direct chain from John M. Morehead and W. H. Arendell through the plaintiff, who owned squares No. 1 and 83 at the time of the conveyance of square No. 1, upon which the Atlantic Hotel is located. The plaintiff introduced a deed from the Shepard's Point Land Company to John M. Morehead, dated August 19, 1859, conveying square No. 1, "bounded on the north by Arendell street, on the east by Third street, on the south by Evans street, and on the west by Fourth street." The plaintiff introduced chain of title to square No. 1 from John M. Morehead to the defendant, and also introduced a map of Morehead City. It will appear by reference to that map that Evans street for a considerable distance, and especially between squares No. 1 and No. 83, "is covered by the tide water at high tide, and has never been opened between squares Nos. 1 and 83, and is not used as a public street."
W. L. Arendell, a witness for the plaintiff, testified:
His honor submitted to the jury the following issues: The court instructed the jury that if they believed the evidence they should answer the first issue "yes," and the second issue "yes," and the defendant excepted. It is agreed that the court answer the issues accordingly. Judgment was rendered thereupon, and the defendant appealed.
The plaintiff's title and right to recover are dependent upon the construction of section 2751 of the Code, being chapter 21, p. 45, Acts 1854-55, in the following language:
The question presented for decision is of great importance, and by no means free from difficulty. It will be well, before entering into an examination of the principles and authorities by which we shall be guided in reaching a conclusion, to note the history of the legislation in North Carolina in regard to the control and disposition of our navigable waters. It was held in Tatum v. Sawyer, 9 N. C. 226, that lands covered by navigable waters were not subject to entry under the entry law of 1777, "not by any express prohibition in that act, but, being necessary for public purposes as common highways for the convenience of all, they are fairly presumed not to have been within the intention of the Legislature."
Ruffin J., in Ward v. Willis, 51 N.C. 183, 72 Am. Dec. 570, said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Leading a Judge to Water: in Search of a More Fully Formed Washington Public Trust Doctrine
...case on the scope of the public trust doctrine and remains the primary authority today."); Shepard's Point Land Co. v. Atlantic Hotel, 44 S.E. 39, 41-42 (N.C. 1903); see also West Indian Co. v. Virgin Islands, 844 F.2d 1007, 1018 (3d Cir. 1988) (citing Illinois Central as a generally unders......