Shepherd v. Jordan, 28513 Summary Calendar.

• Decision Date: 13 May 1970
• Docket Number: No. 28513 Summary Calendar.,28513 Summary Calendar.
• Citation: 425 F.2d 1174
• Parties: Juanita SHEPHERD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Captain R. F. JORDAN, Superintendent of the City of Atlanta Prison Farm, Respondent-Appellant.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

425 F.2d 1174 (1970)

Juanita SHEPHERD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Captain R. F. JORDAN, Superintendent of the City of Atlanta Prison Farm, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 28513 Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1970.

Henry L. Bowden, Thomas F. Choyce, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellant.

James T. McIntyre, Jr., W. Michael B. Stoddard, Atlanta, Ga., amicus curiae.

William H. Traylor, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, CARSWELL and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Superintendent of the City of Atlanta Prison Farm appeals from the grant of a writ of habeas corpus to an indigent person remanded to his custody in default of payment of four $27 fines assessed by the Municipal Court on four charges of disorderly conduct. The basis for the grant of the writ by the lower court was the failure of the municipal court to accord the accused assistance of counsel for her defense under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. We affirm.¹

On May 4, 1968 the accused was convicted of cursing, creating a turmoil, violation of the knife ordinance and resisting arrest. Mrs. Shepherd was not represented by counsel at the time of the hearing nor was she apprised by the court of her right to counsel. She entered guilty pleas to the cursing, creating a turmoil and knife charges and not guilty to resisting arrest. The Municipal Judge found her guilty on all four counts and entered judgments of fines of $27 or sentences of 25 days on each of the four charges. Her request for time to pay the fine was denied and she was committed to the custody of the Superintendent to serve her four sentences consecutively.

Each of the offenses charged against Mrs. Shepherd is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of 6 months and a fine of a maximum of $500.

In Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 88 S.Ct. 1444, 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968), the Supreme Court held that the length of the maximum sentence authorized by a statute proscribing criminal conduct determines the classification of an offense as petty or serious. In James v. Headley, 410 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1969), this court unanimously held that all charges against an accused must be cumulated in measuring the possible sentence which could be imposed for the purpose of calculating whether the offense was petty or serious. Thus Mrs. Shepherd stood before the Municipal Court on charges carrying a maximum of two years in prison and fines of up to $2,000.²

This court has consistently held that persons charged with serious criminal offenses have a right under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the assistance of counsel in their defense. Bohr v. Purdy, 412 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1969); James v. Headley, supra; McDonald v. Moore, 353 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965); Harvey v. Mississippi, 340 F.2d 263 (5th Cir. 1965).

Counsel for the Superintendent points out that most convictions in Municipal Court result in either suspended sentences or fines of $27 or 25 days or less, and that only .5% of those accused receive fines in excess of $54 or 60 days. This argument is not properly addressed to this court but rather to the municipal authorities of the City of Atlanta. These City officials have the option of affording counsel or...