Sheridan v. City of New York

Decision Date28 March 1967
Docket NumberNos. 2906,s. 2906
Citation278 N.Y.S.2d 456,27 A.D.2d 833
PartiesChristopher J. SHERIDAN, Administrator of the Estate of Sarah T. Sheridan, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Marsh & McLennan, Inc., et al., Defendants. MARSH & McLENNAN, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. And Three Other Actions: Index/1965, 8959/1966, 5940/1964. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

V. L. Leibell, Jr., New York City, for third-partyplaintiff-respondent.

M. Kleinbard, Rye, for third-partyplaintiff-respondent.

Before BOTEIN, P.J., and STEVENS, EAGER, CAPOZZOLI, and McNALLY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order entered on October 31, 1966, in the several actions denying motion of third-party defendant to dismiss third-party complaints, unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements and without prejudice to a renewal of the motion on substantial completion of pretrial proceedings.The courts should be 'reluctant to dismiss third-party complaints at the pleading stage, particularly in cases involving the 'passive''active' dichotomy.A claim over 'charging the third person with active negligence will be allowed if the original complaint can reasonably be interpreted as including an allegation of passive negligence on the part of the defendant.'At the pleading stage, the 'pleader (prime plaintiff) is hardly concerned with the problem among the defendants, inter se, and no effort is made to categorize the allegations to assist in the solution of the problem of liability among them.'But even if plaintiff's pleadings are fairly clear, the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Vander Veer v. Tyrrell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 21, 1968
    ...p. 683). Not only is there a reluctance, therefore, to dismiss third-party complaints at the pleading stage (see, Sheridan v. City of New York, 27 A.D.2d 833, 278 N.Y.S.2d 456; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac., par 1010.02), but an even greater reticence in dismissing a cross-complain......
  • Clinton v. 132 East 35th St. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 11, 1971
    ...the solution of the problem of a possible liability over. (See 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac., 1010.02; Sheridan v. City of New York, 27 A.D.2d 833, 278 N.Y.S.2d 456.) Consequently, at the pleading stage, 'it is generally the unusual case in which it can be definitely stated that li......
  • Mamlouk v. Welton Becket and Associates
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 11, 1967
    ... ... May 11, 1967 ...         L. Esterman, New York City, for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant ...         B. Meyerson, New York ... '' Sheridan v. The City of New York; Marsh & McLennan, Inc., et al., 27 A.D.2d 833, 278 N.Y.S.2d 456, decided ... ...
  • Torres v. Transamerican Freight Line, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 30, 1970
    ...the complaint recovery can be had on the ground of passive negligence, the determination should await the trial (Sheridan v. City of New York, 27 A.D.2d 833, 278 N.Y.S.2d 456). Here, while the complaint alleges what appears to be active negligence, the bill of particulars gives clear indica......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT