Sheridan v. Forsee
Decision Date | 25 April 1904 |
Citation | 81 S.W. 494,106 Mo.App. 495 |
Parties | MICHAEL J. SHERIDAN, Respondent, v. ZEILDA FORSEE, Appellant |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Original Opinion of April 25, 1904, Reported at: 106 Mo.App. 495.
Motion overruled.
The appellant calls attention to the following paragraph in the opinion herein, wherein the court misconceived the facts of the record, viz.: It seems that the papers were not demurrers to the different counts of the petition, but demurrers to the evidence on the different counts. We confess to having been mistaken in the matter, but we were led to commit the error, because of said misnomer.
It can make no difference, however, in the result, as the opinion finds that all of said counts were sustained by evidence except as to the third and fifth.
The motion is overruled. All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sheridan v. Forsee
...by Michael J. Sheridan against Zeilda Forsee. From a judgment overruling a motion to quash an execution, defendant appeals. Affirmed. See 81 S. W. 494. James F. Pitt, for appellant. William B. Norris, for BROADDUS, P. J. This appeal is from a judgment of the court overruling a motion to qua......