Shermazanova v. Amerihealth Med., P.C.

Decision Date05 June 2019
Docket NumberIndex No. 502200/12,2017-05698
Citation103 N.Y.S.3d 160,173 A.D.3d 796
Parties Yelena SHERMAZANOVA, Appellant, v. AMERIHEALTH MEDICAL, P.C., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Law Office of Yuriy Prakhin P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Gregory Nahas of counsel), for appellant.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped and fell over the leg of a person sitting in a chair in the reception area of the defendant's medical practice. Subsequently, the plaintiff commenced this personal injury action. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the Supreme Court granted the motion. The plaintiff appeals.

While a possessor of real property has a duty to maintain that property in a reasonably safe condition (see Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868 ), there is no duty to protect or warn against an open and obvious condition, which as a matter of law is not inherently dangerous (see Lazic v. Trump Vil. Section 3, Inc., 134 A.D.3d 776, 776, 20 N.Y.S.3d 643 ; Barone v. Risi, 128 A.D.3d 874, 9 N.Y.S.3d 620 ; Varon v. New York City Dept. of Educ., 123 A.D.3d 810, 998 N.Y.S.2d 433 ; Schiavone v. Bayside Fuel Oil Depot Corp., 94 A.D.3d 970, 942 N.Y.S.2d 585 ; Mathew v. A.J. Richard & Sons, 84 A.D.3d 1038, 1039, 923 N.Y.S.2d 218 ; Katz v. Westchester County Healthcare Corp., 82 A.D.3d 712, 713, 917 N.Y.S.2d 896 ; Tyz v. First St. Holding Co., Inc., 78 A.D.3d 818, 819, 910 N.Y.S.2d 179 ). The issue of whether a dangerous condition is open and obvious is fact-specific, and usually a question of fact for a jury (see Gordon v. Pitney Bowes Mgt. Servs., Inc., 94 A.D.3d 813, 942 N.Y.S.2d 155 ; Cassone v. State of New York, 85 A.D.3d 837, 925 N.Y.S.2d 197 ).

"Whether a hazard is open and obvious cannot be divorced from the surrounding circumstances" ( Katz v. Westchester County Healthcare Corp., 82 A.D.3d at 713, 917 N.Y.S.2d 896 ; see Lazic v. Trump Vil. Section 3, Inc., 134 A.D.3d at 776, 20 N.Y.S.3d 643 ; Barone v. Risi, 128 A.D.3d at 874, 9 N.Y.S.3d 620 ; Baron v. 305–323 E. Shore Rd. Corp., 121 A.D.3d 826, 994 N.Y.S.2d 651 ). "A condition that is ordinarily apparent to a person making reasonable use of his or her senses may be rendered a trap for the unwary where the condition is obscured or the plaintiff is distracted" ( Katz v. Westchester County Healthcare Corp., 82 A.D.3d at 713, 917 N.Y.S.2d 896 ; see Lazic v. Trump Vil. Section 3, Inc., 134 A.D.3d at 776, 20 N.Y.S.3d 643 ; Maneri v. Patchogue–Medford Union Free Sch. Dist., 121 A.D.3d 1056, 996 N.Y.S.2d 64 ; Russo v. Home Goods, Inc., 119 A.D.3d 924, 990 N.Y.S.2d 95 ; Stoppeli v. Yacenda, 78 A.D.3d 815, 816, 911 N.Y.S.2d 119 ; Villano v. Strathmore Terrace Homeowners Assn., Inc., 76 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 908 N.Y.S.2d 124 ).

Here, contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that any hazard due to the placement of chairs in a passageway leading from the reception area of the medical practice to the bathroom was open and obvious, i.e., readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses, given the conditions at the time of the accident (see Baron v. 305–323 E. Shore Rd. Corp., 121 A.D.3d at 826, 994 N.Y.S.2d 651 ; Zhuo Zheng Chen v. City of New York, 106 A.D.3d 1081, 966 N.Y.S.2d 177 ; Hadgraft v. Morin, 94 A.D.3d 701, 941 N.Y.S.2d 513 ; Clark v. AMF Bowling Ctrs., Inc., 83 A.D.3d 761, 921 N.Y.S.2d 273 ; Bloomfield v. Jericho Union Free School...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Derisi v. King Kullen Grocery Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 19 Abril 2021
    ... ... X, LLC, ... supra; Shermazanova v Amerihealth Med., P.C, 173 ... A.D.3d 796, 103 N.Y.S.3d 160 [2d ... ...
  • Mich v. Vintage Steakhouse, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 7 Diciembre 2020
    ... ... opposing papers (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med ... Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 318 [1985]) ... Shermazanova v AmeriHealth Med, P.C, 173 A.D.3d 796, ... 103 N.Y.S.3d 160 [2d ... ...
  • Pirreca v. Smithtown Cent. Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Agosto 2022
    ...or warn against an open and obvious condition that, as a matter of law, is not inherently dangerous (see Shermazanova v. Amerihealth Med., P.C., 173 A.D.3d 796, 797, 103 N.Y.S.3d 160 ; Cupo v. Karfunkel, 1 A.D.3d 48, 767 N.Y.S.2d 40 ). The determination as to whether a dangerous or defectiv......
  • Harvey v. Bayport-Blue Point Union Free Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 10 Junio 2020
    ... ... 923 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Or., 64 ... N.Y.2d 851, 87 N.Y.S.2d 316 [1985]). The movant has the ... (see Robbins v 237Ave. X, LLC, supra; ... Shermazanova v Amerihealth Med., P.C., 173 A.D.3d ... 796, 103 N.Y.S.3d 160 [2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT