Shinn v. Williamson

Decision Date11 March 1996
Citation225 A.D.2d 605,639 N.Y.S.2d 105
PartiesMichael SHINN, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lisa WILLIAMSON, a/k/a "Sister Souljah", etc., Defendant, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Cahill Gordon & Reindel, New York City (Thomas J. Kavaler, Jane M. Byrne, and Marvin S. Putnam, of counsel), and Gail I. Edwin, New York City, for appellant (one brief filed).

Larry Wallace, New York City, for respondent.

Before BALLETTA, J.P., and JOY, KRAUSMAN and FLORIO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the defendant Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated July 8, 1994, as denied that branch of its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action, and (2) an interlocutory judgment of the same court, as was entered December 2, 1994, upon the order.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the interlocutory judgment; and it is further,

ORDERED the interlocutory judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the fifth cause of action is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., and so much of the order as denied that branch of its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action insofar as asserted against it is vacated; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

The subject of this appeal is the fifth cause of action in the complaint brought by the plaintiff Michael Shinn against Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (hereinafter Sony), to recover damages for libel. Shinn alleges that his reputation as a professional songwriter and producer in the music industry was harmed as a result of the publication by Sony of a jacket cover to a record album by rap artist Lisa Williamson, a/k/a "Sister Souljah", which referred to Shinn, along with two other unrelated named individuals, on an acknowledgment page as "Two-Faced Backstabbers".

The Supreme Court declined to dismiss the cause of action against Sony sounding in libel, holding that the challenged statement "Two-Faced Backstabber" was reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation, and thus that it was the jury's function to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Flamm v. Am. Ass'n Univ. Women
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 1 Agosto 1999
    ...Alphonse, 68 N.Y.2d 283, 508 N.Y.S.2d 901, 501 N.E.2d 550 (1986) (phone message and banner in labor dispute); Shinn v. Williamson, 225 A.D.2d 605, 639 N.Y.S.2d 105 (2d Dep't 1996) (epithets on jacket cover of rap album); Ram v. Moritt, 205 A.D.2d 516, 612 N.Y.S.2d 671 (2d Dep't 1994) (state......
  • Flamm v. American Ass'n of University Women
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 17 Diciembre 1998
    ...that plaintiff, identified as a "scab," lacked talent, ambition, and initiative held not actionable); Shinn v. Williamson, 225 A.D.2d 605, 639 N.Y.S.2d 105, 106 (2d Dep't 1996) (reference to plaintiff as "two-faced back stabber" in jacket cover accompanying album is not actionable because i......
  • Abakporo v. News
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Enero 2013
    ...Assn., Inc., 29 A.D.3d 527, 528, 814 N.Y.S.2d 261;Mogil v. Zaia Enters., 230 A.D.2d 778, 779, 646 N.Y.S.2d 376;Shinn v. Williamson, 225 A.D.2d 605, 606, 639 N.Y.S.2d 105), or are simply not defamatory ( see Golub v. Enquirer/Star Group, 89 N.Y.2d 1074, 1076, 659 N.Y.S.2d 836, 681 N.E.2d 128......
  • Costanza v. Seinfeld
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 21 Junio 1999
    ...opportunist" in the context of the circumstances under which it was uttered is a statement of opinion, see Shinn v. Williamson, 225 A.D.2d 605, 639 N.Y.S.2d 105 (2nd Dept.1996). This claim of defamation is also dismissed. Finally, defendants seek sanctions against plaintiff for pursuing a f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT