Shorter v. State
| Decision Date | 18 October 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-2195,87-2195 |
| Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2360,532 So.2d 1110 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2360 Christopher SHORTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Samek & Besser and Lawrence Besser, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Mark S. Dunn and Steven Scott, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and PEARSON, DANIEL S., JJ.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence for second-degree murder and possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We reverse and remand for a new trial based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.
First, we conclude that the prosecuting attorney was guilty of improper conduct in his suggestion made during final argument to the jury that the defendant's sister had previously attacked the homicide victim with a knife; there was utterly no evidence adduced below to support this suggestion. The trial court, in our view, erred in allowing the prosecuting attorney to make this argument. Huff v. State, 437 So.2d 1087, 1089 (Fla.1983); Duque v. State, 498 So.2d 1334, 1337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); State v. Davis, 411 So.2d 1354, 1355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Glassman v. State, 377 So.2d 208, 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Second, we conclude that the prosecuting attorney was also guilty of improper conduct by suggesting on cross examination of the defendant that the defendant had put three police officers in the hospital when the defendant was arrested in this case. Assuming there was some evidence to support this suggestion, we conclude such evidence would have been inadmissible in evidence as its prejudicial impact far outweighed whatever limited relevance it might have as to defendant's alleged consciousness of guilt. Although the trial court correctly sustained the defendant's objection to the prosecuting attorney's improper question, its subsequent cautionary instruction failed to undo the damage done by this time bomb of a question. Jackson v. State, 451 So.2d 458, 461 (Fla.1984), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. June 14, 1988); Finklea v. State, 471 So.2d 596, 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); see Vazquez v. State, 405 So.2d 177, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved in part, quashed in part, 419 So.2d 1088 (Fla.1982); § 90.403, Fla.Stat. (1987).
Lastly, we conclude that the above-stated prosecutorial misconduct, when considered in totality, deprived the defendant of a fair trial in this otherwise close case on whether the defendant shot the deceased with criminal intent or in self-defense; the trial court, therefore, committed reversible error in (1) allowing the aforesaid argument to the jury, and (2) refusing to grant the defendant's motion for mistrial based on the prosecuting attorney's suggestion concerning the defendant's alleged resisting arrest. The improper suggestion in closing argument to the jury concerning the alleged knife attack by the defendant's sister on the homicide victim was designed to undermine...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
DeFreitas v. State
...likes to point the finger at innocent people, if you believe that, let me know. I will sit down now. Id. at 591. In Shorter v. State, 532 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), the Third District Court of Appeal reversed a second-degree murder conviction because of prosecutorial misconduct which oc......
-
Cabrera v. State
...in other uncharged criminal conduct. See Randolph v. State, 556 So.2d 808, 809 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); see generally Shorter v. State, 532 So.2d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Bermudez, 515 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We conclude, however, that the comments complained of by def......
-
Bass v. State, 88-2513
...prosecutorial comment which might be found to be harmless in another setting may become prejudicially harmful. See Shorter v. State, 532 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1988); Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553 (Fla.1985); Williamson v. State, 459 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984); McMillian v. State, 409 ......
-
Zangroniz v. State
... ... corroborate the testimony of the witnesses, witness ... credibility is pivotal and inappropriate prosecutorial ... comment which might be found to be harmless in another ... setting may become prejudicially harmful."); Shorter ... v. State, 532 So.2d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) ... (reversing and remanding for new trial where improper ... comments tended to undermine defendant's self-defense ... claim in "otherwise close case"). Therefore, we ... vacate the conviction and reverse and ... ...