Shouman v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 54175
| Decision Date | 16 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 54175,54175 |
| Citation | 42 Ohio App.3d 159,537 N.E.2d 696 |
| Parties | SHOUMAN, et al., Appellants, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. * |
| Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court
Where the passengers of a vehicle are pursued by fleeing felons, wounded by gunfire during the chase, and injured when their vehicle is rammed and forced off the road, reasonable minds could conclude that such injuries resulted from the ownership, maintenance or use of an uninsured motor vehicle. Thus, summary judgment on this issue is inappropriate in an action, instituted by the passengers, seeking recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of the driver's automobile insurance carrier.
David M. Dworken, Ronald A. Margolis, Painesville, and Patrick J. Perotti, Cleveland, for appellants.
Bernard L. Kahn, Canton, for appellee.
In their sole assigned error appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee insurance company. The trial court held that gunshot wounds sustained by appellants did not result or arise out of the ownership, maintenance or use of an uninsured motor vehicle. Appellants were injured when armed robbers in an unidentified automobile intercepted the car appellants were driving. A chase ensued and, in the course of the chase, the automobile was rammed and one of the appellants was shot. The robbers forced appellants' automobile off the road. Appellants sustained further gunshot wounds as the robbers fired shots while exiting their automobile and while surrounding appellants' vehicle. The robbers fled with a substantial amount of cash.
The appellants sought to recover for their personal injuries under the uninsured motorist provision of the driver's automobile insurance policy. After the appellee insurance company denied coverage, appellants filed the instant complaint to enforce arbitration. The trial court denied that claim and granted summary judgment to appellee, holding that appellants' insurance coverage was only applicable to injuries sustained as the result of an automobile accident, and not to injuries sustained in the shooting/robbery.
The relevant question is whether there is a causal connection between the ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured motor vehicle and the injuries sustained by the use of that vehicle. Kish v. Central Natl. Ins. Group of Omaha (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 41, 50, 21 O.O.3d 26, 32, 424 N.E.2d 288, 294....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Willard v. Kelley
...See Kish v. Central Nat. Ins. Group of Omaha, 67 Ohio St.2d 41, 424 N.E.2d 288, 294-295 (1981); Shouman v. Nationwide Insurance Company, 42 Ohio App.3d 159, 537 N.E.2d 696, 697 (1988); Sciascia v. American Ins. Co., 183 N.J.Super. 352, 443 A.2d 1118, 1121-1122 (L.1982); General Acc. Ins. Co......
-
Cung La v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co.
...while driving on the freeway. See also Foster v. Lafayette Ins. Co., 504 So.2d 82, 86 (La.App.1987); Shouman v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 42 Ohio App.3d 159, 537 N.E.2d 696, 697 (1988); Willard v. Kelley, 803 P.2d 1124, 1131 (Okla.1990); Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Ins. Co., 777 P.2d 932, 93......
-
Worldwide Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Jackson
...den., 505 So.2d 61 (La.1987); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Whitehead, 711 S.W.2d 198 (Mo.Ct.App.1986); Shouman v. Nationwide Ins. Co., 42 Ohio App.3d 159, 537 N.E.2d 696 (1988). Here, no fact broke the causal connection between the vehicle's use and defendant's injury. He is entitled t......
-
McGuire v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.
...car arose out of the operation, use, or maintenance of the uninsured vehicle." Id.{¶ 20} Finally, in Shouman v. Nationwide Ins. Co. , 42 Ohio App.3d 159, 537 N.E.2d 696 (8th Dist.1988), the appellants were occupants of a vehicle that was pursued by gunmen in an unidentified vehicle. During ......