Sibly v. Gomillion

Decision Date29 July 1905
Citation91 S.W. 22
PartiesSIBLY v. GOMILLION.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

George Sibly, in pro. per. Elias Gates, for appellee.

WOOD, J.

To set out and discuss the evidence upon which we base our conclusion could serve no useful purpose. The question is purely one of fact. The Chancellor's finding went further than was necessary to give title to the appellee. Two years' open, continuous, exclusive, and adverse possession under a donation deed gives title. Helena v. Horner, 58 Ark. 151, 23 S. W. 966; Finley v. Hogan, 60 Ark. 499, 30 S. W. 1045; Woolfork v. Buckner (Ark.) 29 S. W. 372; Crill v. Hudson, 71 Ark. 390, 74 S. W. 299; Boynton v. Ashabranner (Ark.) 88 S. W. 566.

We have carefully examined the record, and find that the appellee had title to the land in controversy by adverse possession under his donation deed, when he brought his suit. The decree is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT