Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 99-2286.
| Decision Date | 03 August 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-2286.,99-2286. |
| Citation | 733 NE 2d 1115,89 Ohio St.3d 520 |
| Parties | SIDLE v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY ET AL. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Mark H. Sidle, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, Associate Solicitor, and M. Scott Criss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed on the authority of Woods v. Telb (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 504, 733 N.E.2d 1103, and for failure to comply with the statutory requirements for attachment of commitment papers and verification, R.C. 2725.04.
RESNICK, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
21 cases
-
Chari v. Vore
...329, 703 N.E.2d 1249, 1249-1250; Evans v. Klaeger (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 260, 261, 719 N.E.2d 546, 547; Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 520, 733 N.E.2d 1115. In fact, not even his amended petition, which was filed after the writ was allowed and a return ordered, met th......
-
Carman v. Pinkney
...did not attach any such document to his petition. Such a defect renders the petition susceptible to dismissal. Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 89 Ohio St.3d 520, 733 N.E.2d (2000). In fact, the Ohio Supreme Court has indicated such a defect is fatal. Al'Shahid v. Cook, 144 Ohio St.3d 15, ......
-
Relator v. Wilson, 96204
...to verify the petition requires dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Chari v. Vore, supra; Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 89 Ohio St.3d 520, 2000-Ohio-237, 733 N.E.2d 1115; Wayne v. Bobby, Belmont App. No. 02-BE-72, 2003-Ohio-3882. Alexander has also failed to comply wi......
-
Johnson v. McFaul, 2005 Ohio 1663 (OH 4/4/2005), Case No. 86153.
...attached a copy of the commitment papers to the petition. See Sherrills, supra, citing R.C. 2725.04(D) and Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 89 Ohio St. 3d 520, 733 N.E.2d 1115. Compliance with R.C. 2725.04(D) requires attachment of the journal entry causing petitioner's detention. H......
Request a trial to view additional results