Simari v. State, W--257

Decision Date11 March 1975
Docket NumberNo. W--257,W--257
Citation309 So.2d 183
PartiesRichard John SIMARI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Judith Jeanne Dougherty, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction after a jury trial for breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor and carrying a concealed firearm, for which he received consecutive sentences of five years and one year.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by counsel and our consideration thereof requires a conclusion that appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error during the trial proceedings below.

However, it does appear that the trial court failed to give credit for the time appellant spent in jail prior to sentencing, contrary to F.S. § 921.161(s). We therefore reverse and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to modify the sentence by giving appellant credit for the number of days spent in jail prior to sentencing. Since said judgment and sentence to be entered on remand is corrective in nature and will be less than that already pronounced, the presence of appellant before the trial court is not required. Such may be done by order modifying sentence rather than resentencing appellant in open court. Larson v. State, 301 So.2d 491 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974).

Reversed and remanded for correction of sentence.

JOHNSON, Acting C.J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wells v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 26, 2019
    ...("[T]he court's recitation of the number of days' credit for time served is merely a ministerial act . . . ."); Simari v. State, 309 So. 2d 183, 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975) (classifying a judgment used to revise the amount of jail credit as "corrective in nature"). And the state court en......
  • Smith v. State, 96-2143
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 16, 1997
    ...173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Appellant need not be present for this calculation and correction to take place. See Moore; Simari v. State, 309 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), dismissed, 328 So.2d 844 AFFIRMED, REMANDED. KLEIN, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. ...
  • Simari v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1976
  • Coleman v. State, 74--779
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 1976
    ...sentence to give appellant the appropriate credit. The presence of the appellant will not be required for this purpose. Simari v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1975, 309 So.2d 183. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence Affirmed. HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT