Simmeth v. Walsh (In re Locke)
| Decision Date | 20 August 2014 |
| Citation | 120 A.D.3d 997,2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 05915,991 N.Y.S.2d 384 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | In the Matter of Sallie A. LOCKE, Mary A. Bolo, Brian W. Nolan, Sr. and Faye S. Simmeth, Petitioners–Respondents, v. James A. WALSH, et al., Respondents, Dennis Ward, Commissioner, Erie County Board of Elections, Respondent–Respondent, Tracey B. Ehrlers, Candidate, Annamae L. Stokes, Candidate, Anthony D'Orazio, Jr., Candidate, and Anthony L. Orsini, Jr., Candidate, Respondents–Appellants. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Allegany County (Terrence M. Parker, A.J.), entered August 14, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to the Election Law. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the petition seeking to invalidate certain designating petitions.
Dolce Panepinto, P.C., Buffalo (Jerry Schad of Counsel), for Respondents–Appellants.
Bouvier Partnership LLP, Buffalo (Emilio Colaiacovo of Counsel), for Petitioners–Respondents.
Dennis Ward, Respondent–Respondent Pro Se.
Petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to invalidate the designating petition of respondents-appellants Tracey B. Ehrlers and Annamae L. Stokes for the positions of delegate and alternate delegate, respectively, to the Independence Party 8th Judicial District Convention for State Supreme Court for the 148th Assembly District, and the designating petition of respondents-appellants Anthony D'Orazio, Jr., and Anthony L. Orsini, Jr., for the positions of delegate and alternate delegate, respectively, to the Independence Party 8th Judicial District Convention for State Supreme Court for the 147th Assembly District, on the ground that Ehrlers and D'Orazio lived outside of the boundaries of the assembly districts from which they sought their positions. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting the petition and invalidating the designating petitions, and we therefore reverse the order insofar as appealed from and dismiss the petition.
Even assuming, arguendo, that a candidate for the position of delegate to a judicial district convention must reside within the geographic boundaries of the assembly district that he or she seeks to represent ( see Election Law § 6–124; cf. Matter of Corbin v. Goldstein, 64 A.D.2d 935, 936, 408 N.Y.S.2d 140, lv. denied45 N.Y.2d 707, 409 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 381 N.E.2d 167), such requirement would not become operative until “the time of commencement of the term” of the position (§ 6–122[3]; see Matter of Weidman v. Starkweather, 80...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Carney v. Ward
...Bd. of Appeals, 100 A.D.3d 1559, 1560, 954 N.Y.S.2d 387). In any event, we agree with McCabe that the merits of petitioner's contention [991 N.Y.S.2d 384]are irrelevant because Olivencia's residency status is not open for de novo review under these circumstances ( see generally Northern Wes......
-
McGahay v. Saratoga Cnty. Bd. of Elections
...challenge is therefore premature (see generally Weidman, 80 N.Y.2d at 956, 590 N.Y.S.2d 873, 605 N.E.2d 360). Locke v. Walsh, 120 A.D.3d 997, 997 (4th Dep't, 2014) While this Court may question the legal interpretation of the statutory language by the Court in Corbin, it is nonetheless boun......
-
McGahay v. Saratoga Cnty. Bd. of Elections
...challenge is therefore premature (see generally Weidman, 80 N.Y.2d at 956, 590 N.Y.S.2d 873, 605 N.E.2d 360). Locke v. Walsh, 120 A.D.3d 997, 997 (4th Dep't, 2014) While this Court may question the legal interpretation of the statutory language by the Court in Corbin, it is nonetheless boun......