Simmons Hardware Co. v. Mullen
Decision Date | 06 February 1885 |
Citation | 22 N.W. 294,33 Minn. 195 |
Parties | SIMMONS HARDWARE CO. v MULLEN, SHERIFF, ETC. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from a judgment of the district court, Chippewa county.
T.F. Knappen, for respondent, Simmons Hardware Co.
Shannon & McLarty, for appellant, Aaron J. Mullen.
The agreement for the sale of the goods by plaintiff to Whitcher, the price exceeding $50, and there being no memorandum in writing, and no part of the purchase money being paid, was void under the statute of frauds, unless there was not only a delivery by the vendor, but an acceptance on the part of the purchaser. The authorities are substantially uniform that delivery by the seller to a carrier selected by him, for the purpose of transportation, is not of itself an acceptance to take the case out of the operation of the statute. Norman v. Phillips, 14 Mees. & W. 277; Hanson v. Armitage, 5 Barn. & Ald. 559; Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Me. 98; Johnson v. Cuttle, 105 Mass. 447;Grimes v. Van Vechten, 20 Mich. 413;Allard v. Greasert, 61 N. Y. 1;Keiwert v. Meyer, 62 Ind. 587;Taylor v. Mueller, 30 Minn. 343;S. C. 15 N. W. REP. 413.
The plaintiff in this instance selected the carrier. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider what would have been the effect in respect to taking the case out of the statute of delivery to a carrier designated by the purchaser. Whitcher not having done any act of acceptance, the goods still belonged to the plaintiff, and could not have been levied on as Whitcher's.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams-Hayward Shoe Company v. Brooks
...L., 1st. ed., 730-735; Rogers v. Phillips, 40 N.Y. 579; Billin v. Henkel, 9 Colo., 394; Johnson v. Cuttle, 105 Mass. 447; Simmons Hd. Co. v. Mullen, 33 Minn. 195. CHIEF JUSTICE. CORN, J., and KNIGHT, J., concur. OPINION POTTER, CHIEF JUSTICE. This was an action for the recovery of a balance......
-
Powder River Live-Stock Co. v. Lamb
...v. Roter, (Wis.) 25 N. W. 530;Jamison v. Simon, (Cal.) 8 Pac. 502;Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141, 41 N. W. 465;Hardware Co. v. Mullen, 33 Minn. 195, 22 N. W. 294;Taylor v. Mueller, (Minn.) 15 N. W. 413. In Ex parte Parker, supra, this court quoted with approval the following language used b......
-
Powder River Live Stock Company v. Lamb
... ... Simon , 68 Cal. 17, 8 P ... 502; Fontaine v. Bush , 40 Minn. 141, 41 N.W. 465; ... Simmons Hardware Co. v. Mullen , 33 Minn. 195, 22 ... N.W. 294; Taylor v. Mueller , 30 Minn. 343, 15 N.W ... ...
- Bell v. Stevens