Simmons v. State

Decision Date18 May 1916
Docket Number3 Div. 223
Citation14 Ala.App. 103,71 So. 979
PartiesSIMMONS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Conecuh County; A.E. Gamble, Judge.

George Simmons was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Page, McMillan & Brooks, of Evergreen, for appellant.

W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROWN, J.

The statement of the solicitor, "You must deal with a negro in the light of the fact that he is a negro, and applying your experience and common sense," was improper and calculated to prejudice the defendant before the jury, and the defendant's objection thereto should have been sustained. James v. State, 170 Ala. 72, 54 So. 494; Tannehill v. State, 159 Ala. 51, 48 So. 662. The fact that the defendant was of the negro race did not deprive him of the equal protection of the law, or necessarily discredit his testimony, and should not have been used in argument as a means of arraying the prejudices of the jury against him.

For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Kirksey v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 19, 2014
    ...alibi, prove it by perjured testimony of their own color, and get their accused companion cleared if they can.” ’); Simmons v. State, 14 Ala.App. 103, 104, 71 So. 979 (1916) (holding the prosecutor's following remark to be improper: ‘ “You must deal with a negro in the light of the fact tha......
  • Ivery v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 19, 1996
    ...alibi, prove it by perjured testimony of their own color, and get their accused companion cleared if they can.' "); Simmons v. State, 14 Ala.App. 103, 104, 71 So. 979 (1916) (holding the prosecutor's following remark to be improper: " 'You must deal with a negro in the light of the fact tha......
  • United States ex rel. Haynes v. McKendrick
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 14, 1973
    ...to do certain things that maybe are commonplace for the ordinary person" — imagine, the "ordinary person"! Cf. Simmons v. State, 14 Ala.App. 103, 104, 71 So. 979 (1916) ("You must deal with a Negro in the light of the fact that he is a Negro, and applying your experience and common sense" h......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1926
    ... ... no man, color, race, or condition. Wolffe v. Minnis, ... 74 Ala. 386; Met. L. Ins. Co. v. Carter, 212 Ala ... 212, 102 So. 130; Florence C. & I. Co. v. Field, 104 ... Ala. 471, 16 So. 538; Powe v. State, 19 Ala.App ... 215, 96 So. 370; Simmons v. State, 14 Ala.App. 103, ... 71 So. 979. We are also of the opinion that the exception is ... so presented as to require review ... The ... court in its oral charge gave the following definition of ... manslaughter in the second degree ... "Manslaughter in the second degree is ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT