Simonton v. Citizens' Electric Light & Power Co.
Decision Date | 27 March 1902 |
Citation | 67 S.W. 530 |
Parties | SIMONTON v. CITIZENS' ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO. et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Harris county; Wm. H. Wilson, Judge.
Action by W. W. Simonton against the Citizens' Electric Light & Power Company and others. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Lovejoy, Sampson & Malevinsky, C. E. & A. E. Heidingsfelder, and Burke & Griggs, for appellant. Hutcheson, Campbell & Hutcheson, for appellees.
Appellant brought this suit to recover damages for injuries to the person of his minor son, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The acts of the defendants which are alleged to have caused the injury to plaintiff's son, and are charged to be negligent, are thus stated in plaintiff's petition:
(5) That on or about the said 27th day of August, A. D. 1900, the plaintiff's child, Gussie Simonton, being at that time of the age of 7 years, and lacking mature judgment and discretion, and being unmindful of the danger and hazard connected therewith, while playing with several children around and about said pole, as was their habit and custom, the said Gussie Simonton climbed on said pole, and onto the steps or spikes attached thereto, as aforesaid, and that whilst the said Gussie Simonton was on said pole he lost his balance, and was precipitated from a great height on said pole to the sidewalk below, fracturing his skull, and breaking his arm, injuring his spine and back and internal organs, to wit, his liver, kidneys, and also greatly bruising and injuring his legs and body; that his injuries so received at said time and place have rendered said Gussie Simonton a cripple, and, in addition to the injuries hereinbefore set forth, impaired his eyesight and mental faculties.
"(6) The injuries to the said Gussie Simonton as aforesaid were directly and proximately caused and occasioned by the negligence and carelessness of the defendants, their servants, agents, and employés, in that they negligently and carelessly, and without any regard to the life or security of minor children of immature judgment and discretion who lived in the neighborhood of said pole and played thereon, equipped and maintained said pole with said spikes or steps thereon as aforesaid in a dangerous and hazardous...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Afton Electric Co. v. Harrison
... ... nuisance cannot be invoked. Graves v. Washington Water ... Power Company, (Wash.) 87 P. 956; 11 L. R. A., (N. S.) ... 452, 456; Delaware ... R ... Company v. Fruchter, 260 U.S. 141. The case of ... Simonton v. Electric Light & Power Company, 67 S.W ... 530 illustrates the ... ...
-
Hart v. Union Mfg. & Power Co.
... ... was found hanging on one of the appellant's high-voltage ... electric power wires supported by a metal tower at a place ... and of the ... of Sumter was the owner of its electric light and ice plants, ... erected poles and extended its electric lines beyond ... clear statement of the law is found in the case of ... Simonton v. Citizens', etc., Co., 28 ... Tex.Civ.App. 374, 67 S.W. 530, 531: ... ...
-
Banker v. McLaughlin
...supra, this Court said, citing 6 C.J. 819, San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Morgan, 92 Tex. 98, 46 S.W. 28, and Simonton v. Citizens' E. L. & P. Co., 28 Tex.Civ.App. 374, 67 S.W. 530: "Generally speaking, an attractive nuisance is a thing which may naturally be expected to allure young childr......
-
Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. Compton
... ... through receiving an electric shock from certain high-power ... transmission lines ... 32, 49 A.L.R ... 1047, 285 S.W. 455; Simonton v. Citizens' ... E.L. & P. co., 28 Tex. Civ. App. 374, ... ...