Simonton v. Simonton
| Decision Date | 31 January 1879 |
| Citation | 80 N.C. 7 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | M. J. SIMONTON v. R. SIMONTON, Executrix. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
CIVIL ACTION tried at fall term, 1877, of IREDELL superior court, before Cloud, J.
Mr. R. F. Armfield, for plaintiff .
Messrs. M. L. McCorkle and G. N. Folk, for defendant .
The transcript of the record in this appeal was filed at January term, 1878, containing no concise statement of the case as prescribed in the Code, § 301. It appears by affidavit that the counsel of the parties were unable to agree upon a case and sent their respective statements to the judge, who presided at the trial, to settle it. This has not been done as appears from the return to the writ of certiorari issued by order of the court, and the judge has gone out of office. If this omission were the fault of the appellant, his appeal would be dismissed. Adams v. Reeves, 74 N. C., 106. But as it is not, in accordance with the practice in this court a new trial must be awarded. Mason v. Osgood, 72 N. C., 120; Isler v. Haddock, ibid, 119. And it is so ordered.
Order accordingly.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.
... ... Phelps, 92 N.C. 231; Cameron v. Power Co., 137 ... N.C. 99, 49 S.E. 76; or has retired, Ritter v ... Grimm, 114 N.C. 373, 19 S.E. 239; Simonton v ... Simonton, 80 N.C. 7 ... ... "It is the sole duty of that judge from whose judgment ... an appeal is taken to settle ... ...
-
Larkey Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Byrnes
...329; State v. Parks, 107 N.C. 821, 12 S.E. 572; Taylor v. Simmons, 116 N.C. 70, 20 S.E. 961; Corbly v. Corbly, 202 Ill.App. 469; Simonton v. Simonton, 80 N.C. 7. In v. Schemerhorn, 35 Mich. 370, the Court held that the error complained of was not cured by stipulation of the parties. In that......
-
Larkey Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Byrnes
...329; State v. Parks, 107 N.C. 821, 12 S.E. 572; Taylor v. Simmons, 116 N.C. 70, 20 S.E. 961; Corbly v. Corbly, 202 Ill.App. 469; Simonton v. Simonton, 80 N.C. 7. In Crittenden v. Schemerhorn, 35 Mich. 370, the Court held that the error complained of was not cured by stipulation of the parti......
-
Simmons v. Andrews
...a proviso that this will not be done unless it is made to appear that the appellant was not guilty of laches. Simon-ton v. Sitnonton, 80 N. C. 7; State v. Murray, Id. 364; State v. Fox, 81 N. C. 576; Sanders v. Norris, 82 N. C. 243; State v. O'Kelly, 88 N. C. 609; State v. Randall, Id. 611;......