Simpson v. American Oil Co.
| Decision Date | 08 May 1940 |
| Docket Number | 454. |
| Citation | 8 S.E.2d 813,217 N.C. 542 |
| Parties | SIMPSON v. AMERICAN OIL CO. et al. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
(During the course of the trial a voluntary nonsuit was taken as to the defendant Boon-Iseley Drug Company.)
The plaintiff brought action against the American Oil Company and Boon-Iseley Drug Company to recover for injuries which she alleges she received from the poisonous effect of an insecticide, the spray of which had settled upon various portions of her person and had caused inflammation, pustules and boils of a serious and recurrent nature.
Plaintiff complained that her eyesight was affected, permanent organic injuries had resulted, a serious nervous condition brought on, with occupational loss and mental anguish.
Defendants denied the substantial allegations of the complaint maintained that the preparation manufactured by the defendant Oil Company and sold by the defendant Drug Company was nontoxic as far as humans were concerned, and did not produce the condition complained of, and averred that plaintiff's condition, whatever it was, was not the result of any negligence or want of duty, contractual or otherwise, on their part.
The plaintiff's evidence tended to show that she had purchased of the defendant, Boon-Iseley Drug Company, a can of insecticide, or insect eliminant, distributed by the defendant American Oil Company under the trade-name "Amox", upon which the following statements and guarantees were printed
That plaintiff on the day of the purchase, after having carefully read the instructions, proceeded in accordance therewith and sprayed her studio at No. 110 1/2 Fayetteville Street, in the City of Raleigh, with the insecticide, spraying the furniture and under the mantel; that it was intensely warm at that time and plaintiff was thinly clad, and in the process of spraying a small portion of the spray came in contact with her body especially upon her shoulders, bust and breast; that on the next day she became nauseated and felt suffocated, and collapsed in the midst of a music rehearsal, trembling and perspiring to such an extent that large drops covered her body. This recurred the next day, and almost immediately thereafter she began to have an itching and burning sensation on her chest and bust, and, upon examination, she found that her body had become inflamed and red, and on the next day boils and sores manifested themselves over her whole bust. Plaintiff sought medical advice but grew rapidly worse, the sores and boils increasing in intensity for many weeks, until finally her eyes became affected and the tissues surrounding them became greatly swollen. There was much further evidence as to the condition of the plaintiff, both physically and mentally, which she attributed to the effect of the insecticide which she had used. Mrs. Simpson's testimony was corroborated by her husband, Frank B. Simpson.
Dr. Michael Bolus, a skin specialist, corroborated Mrs. Simpson as to her symptoms and condition, and further testified that he had tried a number of infectious substances upon her, from which he got no reaction, but did try Amox and got reaction; that the Amox test was that which was generally employed for purposes of that kind. It indicated that she was sensitive to Amox, or, rather, that Amox was poisonous to her. Pursuing his investigation, he tested a number of persons at the State's Prison, including a doctor, two nurses and two orderlies, all of whom reacted to the Amox.
On cross-examination he testified that in the test on Mrs. Simpson he was looking for an allergy or hypersensitiveness and found that she was very sensitive to Amox; that she reacted worse to it than did the five men he had tested. He further testified that a volatile substance like Amox would probably evaporate if not covered before reaction took place. This witness testified extensively upon the subject of allergy and allergic sensitivity to various substances.
L. V. Kiger and John P. Wood, witnesses for plaintiff, corroborated Mrs. Simpson as to her collapse in the studio.
W. W. Hinnant testified that he operated the Atlantic Tobacco Company in Raleigh, which company handled Amox, which was purchased from American Oil Company. He sold the Boon-Iseley Drug Company a lot on April 26, 1937. It was packed in 12 dozen six ounce cans, six dozen pints and six dozen quarts. It was sold in the same container in which it was received, that is, it was sold to Boon-Iseley Drug Company in the original case just as it came from the American Oil Company.
Photographs of the body of Mrs. Simpson were exhibited.
R. I. Blackwell, owner of Boon-Iseley Drug Company, testified that he purchased the box of Amox from the Atlantic Tobacco Company, all at one time. All the Amox he had in stock came from the Atlantic Tobacco Company. This witness identified a number of prescriptions from various physicians for skin lotions to be used by Mrs. Simpson and testified that it might have been used for eczema, which the evidence tended to show had been for some time on the plaintiff's ankle.
At the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence, the defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit, which motion was overruled and defendant excepted.
The defendant introduced evidence in rebuttal, Dr. C. C. Carpenter testifying that he had sprayed Amox on 62 students at Wake Forest College, spraying the Amox on the naked arms, after which the sleeves were rolled down and the students went on in their usual manner as if nothing had happened, and then made observations at the end of twenty-four and forty-eight hours, and observed no harmful effects whatever. The arm was sprayed on the inner surface because it was the normal, sensitive, tender area and the clothing could well drop over it in a convenient way. Witness was of the opinion that the Amox was not in any way harmful to the human being, basing this on his own experience with the material. He did not interpret the word "poisonous" as applicable to Amox.
The defendant renewed his motion for judgment of nonsuit at the end of all the evidence and the motion was overruled, and defendant again excepted.
Upon the verdict, the Court signed a judgment for $5,000, from which the defendant appealed, assigning errors.
Ruark & Ruark, of Raleigh, for defendant, appellant American Oil Co.
Douglass & Douglass and John W. Hinsdale, all of Raleigh, for plaintiff, appellee.
1. We do not regard the exceptions to the admission of evidence as meritorious, and refrain from detailed expression of opinion in that connection.
2. The more serious challenge which the defendant makes to the plaintiff's position in this appeal is to the submission of the first issue relating to the supposed warranty of the manufacturer and distributors in the sale of the product "Amox", and the charge of the judge relative thereto, in which he finds such warranty might exist.
The printed matter on the can of Amox described it as "100% active insecticide", and recommends its use in a hand sprayer, from which, of course,...
To continue reading
Request your trial