Simpson v. Camper
| Decision Date | 11 September 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2225,90-2225 |
| Citation | 974 F.2d 1030 |
| Parties | Stacy Mechelle SIMPSON, Appellee, v. Donald M. CAMPER, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
William L. Webster, Jared R. Cone, Jefferson City, Mo., for appellant.
Lawrence H. Pelofsky, Overland Park, Kan., for appellee.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and McMILLAN, * Senior District Judge.
This is a petition for habeas corpus brought by a prisoner in state custody, Stacy Mechelle Simpson. The District Court granted relief, and the state, represented by Donald M. Camper, petitioner's custodian, appealed.
After hearing oral argument, this Court decided that state remedies had not been exhausted. We therefore filed an opinion holding the appeal in abeyance "pending the outcome of a motion to recall the mandate in the Missouri Court of Appeals." Simpson v. Camper, 927 F.2d 392, 394 (8th Cir.1991). Such a motion was promptly filed, and, on May 30, 1991, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, granted the motion, recalled its mandate, and restored to its active docket petitioner's appeal, which had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.
We have now been advised of the Court of Appeals' decision in petitioner's case. On July 14, 1992, that Court issued an opinion granting petitioner essentially the same relief that she had obtained in the District Court below. The Missouri Court of Appeals, acting on state-law grounds, has remanded the cause to the state trial court "for entry of a new plea to the State's charge." State of Missouri v. Stacy Mechelle Simpson, 836 S.W.2d 75, 83 (Mo.App.1992) (per curiam). In practical terms, this is precisely the relief that petitioner has been seeking in this federal proceeding.
The state has now filed a motion with us asking that the appeal pending here no longer be held in abeyance, and that the case be remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss as moot. Petitioner has not opposed this motion, which is, in any event, well taken.
Accordingly, there being no further practical point to this federal habeas proceeding, the motion of respondent Camper is granted. The case is restored to active status, the judgment of the District Court, 743 F.Supp. 1342, is vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court with instructions to vacate its previous action, granting a conditional writ of habeas corpus, and to dismiss pet...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Victor v. Hopkins
...appeals could hold habeas case in abeyance pending exhaustion when it was unclear whether some claims are unexhausted), vacated, 974 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir.1992). Both parties cited Simpson v. Camper in their briefs. We discourage citation of any vacated case as authority.4 Justice Stevens diss......
-
Pankey v. Webster
...v. Camper, 743 F.Supp. 1342, 1343-44 (W.D.Mo.1990) (Hunter, J.), appeal held in abeyance, 927 F.2d 392 (8th Cir.1991), vacated, 974 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir.1992) (ruling that federal habeas corpus proceedings were moot since a Missouri appellate court had granted Stacy Simpson relief which dupli......
-
Friedman's Inc. v. Dunlap
...in a parallel federal action, there is no longer a live controversy and the parallel federal claim is moot. See Simpson v. Camper, 974 F.2d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir.1992) (case was moot where state court granted "precisely the same relief" that was requested in federal action); New York v. Senec......
-
Ali v. Cangemi
...instruct the district court to dismiss, without prejudice, Ali's application for a writ of habeas corpus as moot. See Simpson v. Camper, 974 F.2d 1030, 1031 (8th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950)) (providing the dismis......