Simpson v. Millsaps
Decision Date | 28 April 1902 |
Citation | 31 So. 912,80 Miss. 239 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | ORIN SIMPSON ET AL. v. REUBIN W. MILLSAPS ET AL |
FROM the chancery court of, first district, Hinds county. HON HENRY C. CONN, Chancellor.
Millsaps and others, appellees, were complainants in the court below Simpson and others, appellants, were defendants there.
Appellant filed their bill in the chancery court of Hinds county against appellees, in which they allege that they are legatees of the income of the estate under the will of the late W. H. Tribette, and that appellees are the trustees of said estate under the will; that by the terms of said will the income from certain bank stocks should be paid to them during their lives, and that the corpus of the estate went to other and different parties under certain circumstances; that the income was to go to one class and the corpus of the estate to another; that at the time of the death of said W H. Tribette, November 13, 1897, he owned certain shares of the Capitol State Bank of Jackson, worth at that time $ 194 per share; that at the meetings of the directors of the bank for each of the years 1899 and 1900 certain profits were carried to surplus, thus increasing the corpus of the estate and subsequently certain of these shares were sold for greatly more than their face value at the time of said W. H Tribette's death, and the entire sum was by the trustees carried to the credit of the corpus of the estate, instead of distributing the increased value as part of the income to complainants; that at the time of his death said Tribette owned shares of stock in the Planters' Bank at Clarksdale, which was also sold for a greatly increased amount over the value of same at the time of his death, and the entire amount was placed by the trustees to the credit of the corpus of the estate. The prayer of the bill is that the trustees be ordered to treat the excess of the value of these shares over their value at the death of W. H. Tribette as income, and distribute it as such to complainants. The defendants demurred to the bill on the ground that there was no equity on the face of the bill. The demurrer was sustained, and complainants appealed.
The following is the will of W. H. Tribette:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Nirdlinger's Estate
...was entitled to receive it regardless of the form it took. The question has been before courts of other jurisdictions. In Simpson v. Millsaps, 80 Miss. 239, 31 So. 912, testator directed his trustees to pay to the life tenant the entire net income of his estate and part of the estate was in......
-
Robert v. Mercantile Trust Co.
...refuse to follow it have criticised it severely as one which works injustice and bungling. Kalbach v. Clark, 133 Iowa, 220; Simpson v. Millsaps, 80 Miss. 277; In re Vinton's Appeal, 99 Pa. St. 44; McLouth v. Hunt, 154 N.Y. 179; Soehnlein v. Soehnlein, 146 Wis. 330; Foard v. Trust Co., 122 M......
-
Gist v. Craig
... ... over it, by making a division *** in the form of a ... dividend." ... The ... Mississippi case, Simpson v. Millsaps, 80 Miss. 239, ... 31 So. 912, so strongly relied upon to sustain the ... respondent's position, is not applicable for two reasons: ... ...
-
Robert v. Mercantile Trust Co.
...refuse to follow it have criticised it severely as one which works injustice and bungling. Kalbach v. Clark, 133 Iowa 220; Simpson v. Millsaps, 80 Miss. 277; In Vinton's Appeal, 99 Pa. St. 44; McLouth v. Hunt, 154 N.Y. 179; Soehnlein v. Soehnlein, 146 Wis. 330; Foard v. Trust Co., 122 Md. 4......