Sims v. Lindsay
Decision Date | 03 May 1898 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | SIMS. v. LINDSAY et al. |
Master and Servant —Contributory Negli-gence—Question for the Jury—Sufficiency of Evidence—Rule in Regard to Notice of Defective Machine.
1. The court may hold that a defendant has failed to offer evidence to show contributory negligence, but the jury alone can say whether evidence offered is sufficient to show it.
2. Evidence of an operative in a laundry, in an action for an injury from a defective machine, that she thought the machine with which she was injured more dangerous than a former one she had used, but that nobody had explained the machine to her, and she did not know a guard was necessary, and that she put her fingers close up to the rollers to get the linen in, is not sufficient to show contributory negligence.
3. An operative, by not declining to work at a machine lacking some of the safeguards seen on other machines, does not waive ail claim for damages from the defective machine, unless it is so clearly defective that the employe must be deemed to know of the extra risk
Appeal from superior court, Buncombe county; Timberlake, Judge.
Action by Carrie C. Sims against Robert Lindsay and others. Plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit, and appeals. Reversed.
C. C. Sims, the plaintiff, testified: On cross-examination: Redirect: "I had to put my fingers up close in order to get linen in." Dr. Crawford testified: Dr. Merriweather testified: Cross-examination: Witness further stated that Lindsay told him after the accident that the guard ought to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pigford v. Norfolk-Southern R. Co.
...The charge on the third issue substantially does this, and the language used is sanctioned by the authorities"--citing Sims v. Lindsay, 122 N.C. 678, 30 S.E. 19; v. Hanes, 126 N.C. 359, 35 S.E. 611; Coley v. Railroad, 129 N.C. 407, 40 S.E. 195, 57 L. R. A. 817; Marks v. Cotton Mills, 135 N.......
-
Wright v. Thompson & Moseley, Inc.
... ... N.C. 410, 51 S.E. 69; Hicks v. Manufacturing Co., ... 138 N.C. 319-327, 50 S.E. 703, citing Lloyd v ... Hanes, 126 N.C. 359, 35 S.E. 611; Sims v ... Lindsay, 122 N.C. 678, 30 S.E. 19; Patterson v ... Pittsburg, 76 Pa. 389, 18 Am. Rep. 412; Kane v ... Railroad, 128 U.S. 95, 9 S.Ct. 16, ... ...
-
Pressly v. Dover Yarn Mills
...The charge on the third issue--as to assumption of risk--is also supported by well-considered adjudications of this court. Simms v. Lindsay, 122 N.C. 678, 30 S.E. 19; Lloyd v. Hanes, 126 N.C. 359, 35 S.E. 611. In v. Cotton Mills (at this term) 50 S.E. 703, the court has held that, while the......
-
Howard v. Bingham
...and within the rule that ordinarily nonsuit will not be allowed in favor of the party upon whom rests the burden of proof, Sims v. Lindsay, 122 N.C. 678, 30 S.E. 19, the principle is well settled that when the plaintiff's own testimony establishes contributory negligence as a matter of law ......