Sims v. State

Decision Date23 February 1921
Docket Number11787.
Citation196 P. 132,80 Okla. 254,1921 OK 68
PartiesSIMS v. STATE.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

Sections 1 and 4 of the act of the Legislature of 1915, chapter 176 provide:

"Section 1. That cotton gins are hereby declared to be public utilities, and the operation of same for the purpose of ginning seed cotton is declared to be a public business. * * *

Sec. 4. That the Corporation Commission shall have the same power and authority and be charged with the duty of regulating and controlling such cotton gins in all matters relating to the performance of public duties and the charges therefor, and correcting abuses and preventing unjust discrimination and extortion, as is exercised by said Commission as to transportation and transmission companies, and shall have the same power to fix rates, rules, charges and regulations to be observed by such person or persons, or corporation, operating gins, and the affording of all reasonable conveniences facilities and service as it may impose as to transportation or transmission companies."

Held under said sections, that cotton gins within the state of Oklahoma are public utilities, and that the Corporation Commission is vested with jurisdiction to prescribe the price to be charged for bagging and ties furnished to customers by the operators of gins.

Appeal from Order of Corporation Commission.

The Corporation Commission in proceedings had before it issued Order No 1785, prescribing the retail price of bagging and ties to be charged by the operators of gins for the season of 1920, from which Jake Sims appeals adversely to the State. Affirmed.

Bond, Melton & Melton, of Chickasha, for appellant.

E. S. Ratliff, of Ada, for the State.

KENNAMER J.

Jake Sims, the appellant, prosecutes this appeal to reverse Order No. 1785 of the Corporation Commission of the state of Oklahoma, made on the 11th day of September, 1920, prescribing the rate for ginning cotton and the price to be charged by ginners furnishing bagging and ties. The material parts of the order appealed from read as follows:

"1. All cotton ginned in Oklahoma, during the coming season shall be charged for on the 'seed bases' as is the custom at the present time.
2. Rates and charges for ginning cotton in the state of Oklahoma from and after the effective date of this order, shall be forty cents (40¢) per one hundred (100) pounds for ginning seed cotton, fifty cents (50¢) per one hundred (100) pounds for ginning snapped cotton, and sixty cents (60¢) per one hundred (100) pounds for ginning 'bollies.'
3. That ginners who have not installed seed scales will, in the instances in which they are unable to agree upon an estimate of amount of seed, be required to catch and weigh the same.
4. The ginner must perform such ginning service in a proper and workmanlike manner, using due care and diligence in producing a clean product and in saving for the owner of the cotton the full and fair weight to which he may be justly entitled.
5. That charges for bagging and ties shall be $2.00 for the coming season."

That part of the order prescribing the price to be charged by ginners furnishing bagging and ties is the only part of the order which the appellant seeks to reverse and set aside, and the only question presented to this court for decision is whether the Corporation Commission is vested with jurisdiction to prescribe the price to be charged for bagging and ties which gin operators furnish to their customers.

The counsel for the appellant contend that there is no duty imposed by the Legislature upon cotton ginners to furnish bagging and ties; that bagging and ties are merchantable articles subject to purchase and sale, dealt in by some cotton ginners and by other persons in the state, and that the Commission has never sought to require the cotton ginners to furnish bagging and ties with which to wrap cotton, either as a part of the services of ginning or as a merchantable article for the convenience of the customers; that the Commission is without jurisdiction to require the ginners to furnish bagging and ties as a part of the services rendered by a cotton gin in ginning cotton, because the Commission could not control the prices of the manufacturer or the wholesaler, therefore the Commission is without jurisdiction to prescribe the prices to be charged for bagging and ties when furnished by the ginner. The order made in the case at bar is not attacked as being unreasonable or unfair.

The Session Laws of 1915, chapter 176, provides:

"Section 1. That cotton gins are hereby declared to be public utilities, and the operation of same for the purpose of ginning seed cotton is declared to be a public business. * * *
Sec. 4. That the Corporation Commission shall have the same power and authority and be charged with the duty of regulating and controlling such cotton gins in all matters relating to the performance of public duties and the charges therefor, and correcting abuses and preventing unjust discrimination and extortion, as is exercised by said Commission as to transportation and transmission companies, and shall have the same power to fix rates, rules, charges and regulations to be observed by such person or persons, or corporation, operating gins, and the affording of all reasonable conveniences, facilities and service as it may impose as to transportation or transmission companies."

Under section 1 of said act, supra, cotton gins are declared to be public utilities, and the operation of the same is declared to be public business.

Under section 4 of said act, supra, the Corporation Commission is vested with authority and charged with the duty of regulating and controlling cotton gins in all matters relating to the performance of public duties and the charges therefor correcting abuses and preventing unjust discrimination and extortion. To hold that the Corporation Commission is without jurisdiction to prescribe the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT