Singuefield v. General Oglethorpe Hotel Co., 41816

• Decision Date: 16 March 1966
• Docket Number: No. 41816,No. 3,41816,3
• Citation: 113 Ga.App. 326,148 S.E.2d 92
• Parties: J. Earl SINGUEFIELD v. GENERAL OGLETHORPE HOTEL COMPANY
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 92

148 S.E.2d 92

113 Ga.App. 326

J. Earl SINGUEFIELD v. GENERAL OGLETHORPE HOTEL COMPANY.

No. 41816.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 3.

March 16, 1966.

Syllabus by the Court

This action was properly brought in the county of the legal residence of the defendant corporation and the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant's plea to the jurisdiction.

Allgood & Childs, Augusta, Dickey, Futrell & Barker, Reginald M. McDuffee, Savannah, for appellant.

Richardson, Doremus & Karsman, Stanley Karsman, Savannah, for appellee.

JORDAN, Judge.

J. Earl Singuefield filed suit in the Superior Court of Chatham County against the General Oglethorpe Hotel Company, a Georgia corporation, to recovery damages for personal injuries sustained by him on June 15, 1963, in a hotel allegedly owned and operated by the defendant in Chatham County, Georgia.

The defendant corporation filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that it did not have an officer, agent or place of business in Chatham County and was not doing business in that county, it being alleged therein that the venue of this action was in Fulton County where the office of its Executive Vice President and Secretary and Treasurer, Martin H. Rubin, was located.

The trial court after a hearing sustained this plea and dismissed the plaintiff's petition. This appeal is from that judgment. The defendant-appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no enumeration of error has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant as required by law.

1. The record before this court discloses that a timely and proper enumeration of error was filed by the appellant and made a part of the record here; the motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

2. The burden of proof was on the defendant to establish the averments of its plea to the jurisdiction including the allegation that the venue of this action was in Fulton County and not Chatham County. Pyron & Son v. Ruohs, 120 Ga. 1060(2), 48 S.E. 434; Kahn v. Southern Building, etc., Assn., 115 Ga. 459(1), 41 S.E. 648; Code § 81-502. To carry this burden the defendant introduced evidence showing that the corporation had ceased doing business in Chatham County and did not have an officer or agent there and that the only officer or agent of the corporation who resided in the State of Georgia was its Executive Vice President and Secretary and Treasurer, Martin H. Rubin, who lived in DeKalb County and had an office in Fulton County at which he transacted corporate business.

The defendant did not, however, introduce in evidence the corporate charter or produce any other evidence to show that the principal place of business, or legal residence, of the corporation was in Fulton County and not in Chatham County or elsewhere; and as stated by this court in Hutcheson Mfg. Co. v. Chandler, 29 Ga.App. 726, 728, 116 S.E. 849, 850, 'The domicile of a corporation dies not depend upon the place of the residence of its officers, but upon the terms of its charter.' The principal place of business of a corporation as fixed by its charter is its legal residence and the only place it can be sued in the absence of the application of special statutory provisions. Hutcheson Mfg. Co. v. Chandler, supra; Southern Lumber Co. v. Ramsey-Wheeler Co., 38 Ga.App. 481, 144 S.E. 349. In this connection counsel for the defendant in response to questioning by the court did admit that the principal place of business of the corporation was in ...