Sisk v. Randon
Decision Date | 02 May 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 1767-5892.,1767-5892. |
Citation | 70 S.W.2d 689 |
Parties | SISK et al. v. RANDON et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is found at 33 S.W.(2d) 1082. We refer thereto for a full statement. In the condition the record reaches this court the only law question really presented is the proper construction to be given the following instrument of writing:
It appears that since the execution of the above deed both the grantors therein have died. The westerly one-half of the tract of land described in the above deed is not involved in this appeal.
The Court of Civil Appeals holds that the above deed, on its face, operated to convey to Emanuel Randon and Adranna Randon the fee-simple title to the easterly one-half of the 100 acres described therein. The easterly one-half is the river end of the land. We agree with this holding. In this connection we think a reading of the deed will demonstrate that, by its unambiguous and express terms, it operated to convey the present fee-simple title to the easterly one-half, or river end, of the 100-acre tract of land described therein to the grantees named. It will here be noted that the deed expressly stated that it is the intention of the grantors to convey to the grantees "the fee simple title" to the land just mentioned, "subject to the right of the grantors, if they should desire, which right is reserved, to occupy the house in which they now live during the life of either of them."
Plaintiffs in error seem to contend that the above deed is illegal and ineffective because it is nothing more...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boddy v. Canteau, 14747
...portions thereof. Under the record before us defendant's seventh point of error must be overruled. Rule 372, T.R.C.P.; Sisk v. Randon, 123 Tex. 326, 70 S.W.2d 689 (1934); Sloan v. Miami Margarine Co., 247 S.W.2d 169 (Tex .Civ.App.--Dallas 1952, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Dyches v. Ellis, 199 S.W.2......
-
Anglin v. Cisco Mortg. Loan Co.
...to the grantors. The effect of the quoted constitutional provision is well stated by Critz, J., in the case of Sisk v. Randon, 123 Tex. 326, 70 S.W.2d 689, 693, as follows: "Under the above constitutional provision it is permissible to prove that a deed was in fact intended as a mortgage. T......
-
Bradshaw v. McDonald
...S.W.2d 355, where the exact question in this case was presented, that Pridgen v. Furnish was not controlling. Dictum in Sisk v. Random, 123 Tex. 326, 70 S.W.2d 689, suggests a distinction between ah absolute deed as a mortgage generally and as a mortgage or "pretended sale" of a homestead, ......
-
Young v. Rudd
...are words of present conveyance and complete alienation. Hammett v. Farrar, Tex.Com.App., 29 S.W.2d 949; Sisk v. Random, Tex.Civ.App., 33 S.W.2d 1082, Id., 123 Tex. 326, 70 S.W.2d 689. It does not contain a warranty but none is necessary to a valid conveyance. Art. 1293, R.S. of Texas. In H......