Sittig v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc., 90-31

Decision Date13 September 1990
Docket NumberNo. 90-31,90-31
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D2338 Armanda M. SITTIG, M.D., Appellant, v. TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1990.

Donna H. Stinson of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, FitzGerald & Sheehan, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

John D. Buchanan, Jr. of Henry, Buchanan, Mick & English, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals the dismissal of her complaint for failure to prosecute, claiming that the dismissal violates her constitutional right of access to the courts. We agree and reverse.

Appellant is an obstetrician who served on the staff of Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center (appellee) until her staff privileges were suspended by the hospital pursuant to the peer review process prescribed by Section 395.0115(1), Florida Statutes (1985), which provides:

If the governing board of any licensed facility has reasonable belief that conduct by a staff member may constitute one or more grounds for discipline as provided in this subsection, the board shall investigate and determine whether grounds for discipline exist with respect to the staff member. The governing board of any licensed facility, after considering the recommendations of its medical staff, shall suspend, deny, revoke, or curtail the staff privileges, or reprimand, counsel, or require education, of any staff member after a final determination has been made that one or more of the following grounds exist:

(a) Incompetence.

(b) Being found to be a habitual user of intoxicants or drugs to the extent that he is deemed dangerous to himself or others.

(c) Mental or physical impairment which may adversely affect patient care.

(d) Being found liable by a court of competent jurisdiction for medical negligence or malpractice involving negligent conduct.

(e) One or more settlements exceeding $10,000 for medical negligence or malpractice involving negligent conduct by the staff member.

(f) Medical negligence other than as specified in paragraphs (d) or (e).

(g) Failure to comply with the policies, procedures, or directives of the risk management program or any quality assurance committees of any licensed facility. However, the procedures for such actions shall comply with the standards outlined by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, the American Osteopathic Association, the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, and the "Medicare/Medicaid Conditions of Participation," as such procedures existed on January 1, 1985. The procedures shall be adopted pursuant to hospital bylaws.

Appellant then filed suit against appellee, alleging, among other things, breach of contract, violation of medical staff requirements under Section 395.0115, and libel. Section 395.0115(5) provides:

(5)(a) In the event that the defendant prevails in an action brought by a staff member against any person or entity that initiated, participated in, was a witness in, or conducted any review as authorized by this section, the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the defendant.

(b) As a condition of any staff member bringing any action against any person or entity that initiated, participated in, was a witness in, or conducted any review as authorized by this section and before any...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Don's Sod Co., Inc. v. Department of Revenue, State of Fla.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Octubre 1995
    ...J., and PADOVANO, P.J., Associate Judge, concur. 1 Psychiatric Associates affirmed the case of Sittig v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc., 567 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).2 Art. I, Sec. 21, Fla. Const., provides:Access to courts.--The courts shall be open to every person......
  • Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 31 Marzo 2005
    ...did not impinge upon the plaintiff's constitutional right to access to the courts), with Sittig v. Tallahassee Mem'l Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 567 So.2d 486, 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (concluding that statute requiring posting of a bond as a condition to bringing an action was unconstitutional a......
  • Psychiatric Associates v. Siegel
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 3 Diciembre 1992
    ...for appellate review Psychiatric Associates v. Siegel, 567 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Sittig v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc., 567 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal invalidated sections 395.011(10)(b) 1, 395.0115(5)(b) 2, ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Medical malpractice caps move from the legislature to the courts: will they survive?
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 78 No. 5, May 2004
    • 1 Mayo 2004
    ...(60) See Moore, 126 So. 2d at 549. (61) See Smith, 507 So. 2d at 1089. (62) Cf. Sittig v. Tallahassee Memorial Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 567 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1990) (holding that a bond requirement that was a condition precedent to a lawsuit was unconstitutional as applied where the plaintiff w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT