Skelly v. The Maccabees

Decision Date13 May 1925
Docket NumberNo. 3714.,3714.
Citation272 S.W. 1089
PartiesSKELLY v. THE MACCABEES.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jasper County.

Suit by Esta M. Skelly against The Maccabees. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

R. P. & C. B. Williams, of St. Louis, and John E. Owen, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Claude Kenney and Owen & Davis, all of Joplin, for respondent.

BRADLEY, J.

This is a suit by the beneficiary to recover on a fraternal insurance policy in the sum of $1,000. Trial was had before the court without a jury, and plaintiff obtained judgment as prayed, and defendant appealed.

The petition is in the usual form. The answer pleads payment of $500, under provisions of the policy, to insured's guardian. A reply challenges the legality of this payment. The policy was issued to R. S. Skelly December 11, 1913, and his sister, plaintiff herein, was named as the beneficiary. Insured married in 1920, but made no change of beneficiary in the policy. The policy, so far as pertinent, provided:

"If, by reason of accident, sickness or disease, the member shall become totally and permanently disabled from performing or directing any kind of labor or business * * * he shall be entitled to receive in one sum the one-half of this certificate."

September 20, 1922, insured was adjudged insane by the probate court of Jasper county, and his wife, Beatrice Skelly, was appointed as his guardian. Previous to the inquisition in the probate court, insured had been committed to the asylum at Nevada, Mo., and was there at the time of the probate court proceedings. After insured was adjudged insane and the appointment of a guardian for him, defendant, under the provision of the policy quoted, paid to said guardian the sum of $500, and the money so paid was expended for the benefit of insured and his family. Insured died in the asylum April 26, 1923.

Plaintiff contends that the judgment in the probate court adjudging insured to be insane is void because of a lack of service upon the insured. Sections 444 et seq., R. S. 1919, prescribe the procedure for a sanity inquisition in the probate court. Notice of the proceedings was served upon insured in the asylum at Nevada by a nurse. The notice required by section 446 is jurisdictional, and corresponds to the summons in ordinary actions. State ex rel. v. Duncan, 195 Mo. App. 541, loc. cit. 551, 193 S. W. 950; State ex rel. v. Robinson, 270 Mo. 212, loc. cit. 229, 192 S. W. 1001; Hunt v. Searcy, 167 Mo. 158, 67 S. W. 206; Crow v. Myersieck, 88 Mo. 411. The service of the notice provided for by section 446 must be by the sheriff or other proper officer of the court. It is only after a party is in court that service of notice may be made by a private individual as provided in section 1217, R. S. 1919 (State ex rel. v. Robinson, supra). Insured was not present at the hearing in the probate court, but the court appointed an attorney to represent him. This, however, could not take the place of service, and there is no such contention. There can be no escape from the conclusion that the judgment of the probate court adjudging insured to be insane is absolutely void and without effect because of failure to serve notice upon insured as required by law. Said judgment, being wholly void for want of jurisdiction, is subject to collateral attack. Hunt v. Searcy, 167 Mo. 158, 67 S. W. 206; Bank v. Shanklin, 174 Mo. App. 639, 161 S. W. 341; Kellogg v. Moore, 271 Mo. 189, loc. cit. 192, 196 S. W. 15; Russell v. Grant, 122 Mo. 161, 26 S. W. 958, 43 Am. St. Rep. 563; Givens v. Harlow, 251 Mo. 231, 158 S. W. 355; Howell v. Sherwood, 213 Mo. 565, 112 S. W. 50; 23 Cyc. 170; 34 C. J. 528, § 834. Since the sanity inquisition judgment was void, it follows, of course, that the appointment of the guardian was also void.

Defendant does not seriously contend that there is any life in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex rel. Bovard v. Weill
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 5, 1944
    ...of a trustee, except where expressly or by necessary indication limited by statute. Michael v. Locke, 80 Mo. 584; Skelly v. Maccabees, 217 Mo. App. 333, 272 S.W. 1089; Secs. 461, 470, Chap. 1, Art. XVIII, Laws Missouri. (5) It is universally held that, absent some express statute to the con......
  • Finley v. Farrar
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1943
    ...a duly authorized officer with power to serve such notice, he being a constable and not a sheriff nor a deputy sheriff. Skelly v. Macabee, 217 Mo. App. 333, 272 S.W. 1089. (12) A legal or common law jury in Missouri consists of 12 men, and except in cases where the statute provides otherwis......
  • Skelly v. The MaCcabees
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 13, 1925
  • Phillips v. The Savings Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • September 10, 1935
    ...67 Fed. (2d) 177, 179; Stetina v. Bergstein, 204 Mo. App. 366, 370; State ex rel. Stetina v. Reynolds, 286 Mo. 120; Skelly v. The Maccabees, 217 Mo. App. 333, 341. (3) The derivation of Section 5465, R.S. 1929, relating to the deposits of minors in trust companies, shows that such deposits ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT